Previous post only went to dev list. Ensuring both and adding a bit more...
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:37 AM Paul Michali wrote:
> Xav,
>
> The discussion is very important, and hence why both Kyle and I have been
> posting these questions on the operator (and dev) lists. Unfortunately, I
> was
Oops, sorry about the blank email. Answers/Questions in-line.
On 26/08/15 07:46, Paul Michali wrote:
> Previous post only went to dev list. Ensuring both and adding a bit more...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:37 AM Paul Michali wrote:
>
>> Xav,
>>
>> The discussion is very important, and
James,
Great stuff! Please see @PCM in-line...
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:26 PM James Dempsey
wrote:
> Oops, sorry about the blank email. Answers/Questions in-line.
>
> On 26/08/15 07:46, Paul Michali wrote:
> > Previous post only went to dev list. Ensuring both and adding a bit
> more...
> >
On 26/08/15 23:43, Paul Michali wrote:
> James,
>
> Great stuff! Please see @PCM in-line...
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:26 PM James Dempsey
>> 1) Horizon compatibility
>>
>> We run a newer version of horizon than we do neutron. If Horizon
>> version X doesn't work with Neutron version X-1,
Thanks for the links and thoughtful comments James!
In the Heat documentation, is the subnet ID being treated as optional (or
is the documentation not correct)? I think it is a required argument in the
REST API. Ref:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutro
