Matt Fischer wrote:
Agreed, I'm pretty sure we've already discussed it enough.
The auto-responder is up.
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operat
Hi,
I have an icehouse openstack setup.
I have the following lines in nova.conf:
force_config_drive = always
config_drive_cdrom = True
Whenever I launch an instance, I can see a content directory in the config
drive
openstack/content/ contains all network interfaces.
I can simply configur
+1, I think we should just go ahead and do this.
On 7/1/15, 3:23 PM, "Richard Raseley" wrote:
>Matt Fischer wrote:
>> We've been discussing this for 3 months now, so my vote is "soon". Can
>> we make the Puppet Labs ML have an auto-responder that redirects people?
>
>Yes we can. I propose th
Matt Fischer wrote:
We've been discussing this for 3 months now, so my vote is "soon". Can
we make the Puppet Labs ML have an auto-responder that redirects people?
Yes we can. I propose the following:
1) Put up an auto-responder ASAP with the following text:
---
Thank you for your message to
We've been discussing this for 3 months now, so my vote is "soon". Can we
make the Puppet Labs ML have an auto-responder that redirects people?
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Richard Raseley
wrote:
> Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>> This was my action from the puppet meeting this week, so here's my
>
Matt Fischer wrote:
This was my action from the puppet meeting this week, so here's my
follow-up:
I discussed this with Tom Fifield. He has no objections to us using the
operators list like that and in
addition he has enabled tags with a new topic called [puppet] so that
folks could sub/ignore i
This was my action from the puppet meeting this week, so here's my
follow-up:
I discussed this with Tom Fifield. He has no objections to us using the
operators list like that and in
addition he has enabled tags with a new topic called [puppet] so that folks
could sub/ignore it.
Here's his message
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Richard Raseley wrote:
> As part of wrapping up the few remaining 'loose ends' in moving the Puppet
> modules under the big tent, we are pressing forward with deprecating the
> previously used 'puppet-openst...@puppetlabs.com' mailing list in favor of
> both the op
On 06/15/2015 07:46 PM, Richard Raseley wrote:
> As part of wrapping up the few remaining 'loose ends' in moving the
> Puppet modules under the big tent, we are pressing forward with
> deprecating the previously used 'puppet-openst...@puppetlabs.com'
> mailing list in favor of both the openstack-
As part of wrapping up the few remaining 'loose ends' in moving the
Puppet modules under the big tent, we are pressing forward with
deprecating the previously used 'puppet-openst...@puppetlabs.com'
mailing list in favor of both the openstack-dev and openstack-operators
lists with the '[puppet]'
10 matches
Mail list logo
