[Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-01 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi all, The below was suggested for a Forum session but we don't yet have a submission or name to chair/moderate. I, for one, would certainly be interested in providing input. Do we have any owners out there? Resource reservation requirements: == The Blazar project [https://wiki.openstack.org/wik

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/1/2017 8:36 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: Hi all, The below was suggested for a Forum session but we don't yet have a submission or name to chair/moderate. I, for one, would certainly be interested in providing input. Do we have any owners out there? Resource reservation requirements: == The

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-01 Thread Joe Topjian
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/1/2017 8:36 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The below was suggested for a Forum session but we don't yet have a >> submission or name to chair/moderate. I, for one, would certainly be >> interested in providing input. Do w

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-02 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi all, So I've proposed a Forum session to discuss some of these issues and use-cases: http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/124 - there would seem to be value in getting Nova, Blazar and OPIE folks together to talk about advanced scheduling use-cases. In particular it looks like there is

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-03 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/01/2017 08:32 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Matt Riedemann mailto:mriede...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 4/1/2017 8:36 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: Hi all, The below was suggested for a Forum session but we don't yet have a submission or name t

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-03 Thread Joe Topjian
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/01/2017 08:32 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Matt Riedemann > > wrote: >> >> On 4/1/2017 8:36 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The below was suggeste

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-03 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Jay, On 4 April 2017 at 00:20, Jay Pipes wrote: > However, implementing the above in any useful fashion requires that Blazar > be placed *above* Nova and essentially that the cloud operator turns off > access to Nova's POST /servers API call for regular users. Because if not, > the informatio

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-04 Thread Tomáš Vondra
m: Blair Bethwaite [mailto:blair.bethwa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 12:08 AM To: Jay Pipes Cc: openstack-oper. Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session Hi Jay, On 4 April 2017 at 00:20, Jay Pipes wrote: > However, i

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-04 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/03/2017 06:07 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: Hi Jay, On 4 April 2017 at 00:20, Jay Pipes wrote: However, implementing the above in any useful fashion requires that Blazar be placed *above* Nova and essentially that the cloud operator turns off access to Nova's POST /servers API call for reg

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-04 Thread Tim Bell
Some combination of spot/OPIE and Blazar would seem doable as long as the resource provider reserves capacity appropriately (i.e. spot resources>>blazar committed along with no non-spot requests for the same aggregate). Is this feasible? Tim On 04.04.17, 19:21, "Jay Pipes" wrote: On 04/0

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-04 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/04/2017 02:48 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Some combination of spot/OPIE What is OPIE? and Blazar would seem doable as long as the resource provider reserves capacity appropriately (i.e. spot resources>>blazar committed along with no non-spot requests for the same aggregate). Is this feasible?

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-06 Thread Masahito MUROI
Hi all, I'm late to the discussion. Some of members in Blazar's team have an interest from NFV side for the resource reservation. So we have one usecase that telecom operators want to reserve instance slots at a specific time window because of expected workload increasing. I'm thinking the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-06 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Jay, On 5 April 2017 at 03:21, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/03/2017 06:07 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: >> That's something of an oversimplification. A reservation system >> outside of Nova could manipulate Nova host-aggregates to "cordon off" >> infrastructure from on-demand access (I believe Blazar

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-06 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Tim, It does seem feasible, but imagine the aggregate juggling... it's something of an indictment that from where we are today this seems like a step forward. I'm not a fan of pushing that load onto operators when it seems like what we actually need is fully-fledged workload scheduling in Nova.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-11 Thread Pierre Riteau
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 22:23, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 04/04/2017 02:48 PM, Tim Bell wrote: >> Some combination of spot/OPIE > > What is OPIE? Maybe I missed a message: I didn’t see any reply to Jay’s question about OPIE. OPIE is the OpenStack Preemptible Instances Extension: https://github.com/i

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-11 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/11/2017 02:08 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote: On 4 Apr 2017, at 22:23, Jay Pipes mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 04/04/2017 02:48 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Some combination of spot/OPIE What is OPIE? Maybe I missed a message: I didn’t see any reply to Jay’s question about OPIE. Thanks! O

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific] Resource reservation requirements (Blazar) - Forum session

2017-04-14 Thread Masahito MUROI
Hi scientific team, As Jay mentioned the previous mail, I drafted the instance reservation[1] of Blazar and some have already added their comments. 1. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/new-instance-reservation Please adds your comments, concerns and/or what you want. It could make more clear