Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

Certainly the aim is to support upgrades between LTS releases. Getting a meaningful keynote slot at an OpenStack summit is more of a challenge. On 6 Nov 2015 9:27 pm, "Jonathan Proulx" wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:28:13PM +, Mark Baker wrote: > :Worth mentioning

Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2015-11-05 22:15:18 -0800: > Hello all, > > I'll start by acknowledging that this is a big and complex issue and I > do not claim to be across all the view points, nor do I claim to be > particularly persuasive ;P > In the future, also consider not making

Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

ment Mailing List Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer. Hello all, I'll start by acknowledging that this is a big and complex issue and I do not claim to be across all the view points, nor do I claim to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

t; > vendors that understand this. Keeping up with the release cycle just for >> > the >> > sake of keeping up with the release cycle is exhausting. >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com] >