[Openstack-operators] [dev][doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-27 Thread Alexandra Settle
: OpenStack Operators , "'openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org'" Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future Hi everyone, I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operation

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-23 Thread Alexandra Settle
Hey Blair, Thanks ( I appreciate your offer of assistance. We are in full swing at the moment. The spec is very close to being merged. You can view that here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/ I am still looking for someone who can help us out with the pandoc conversion. I am happy to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-22 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Alex, On 2 June 2017 at 23:13, Alexandra Settle wrote: > O I like your thinking – I’m a pandoc fan, so, I’d be interested in > moving this along using any tools to make it easier. I can't realistically offer much time on this but I would be happy to help (ad-hoc) review/catalog/clean-up i

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-02 Thread Alexandra Settle
Date: Friday, June 2, 2017 at 1:53 PM To: Alexandra Settle Cc: Blair Bethwaite , OpenStack Operators , "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org" Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-02 Thread Anne Gentle
I'm okay with option 3. Since we hadn't heard from anyone yet who can do the work, I thought I'd describe a super small experiment to try. If you're interested in the export, run an experiment with Pandoc to convert from RST to Mediawiki. http://pandoc.org/demos.html You'll likely still have clea

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-02 Thread Alexandra Settle
Blair – correct, it was the majority in the room. I just wanted to reach out and ensure that operators had a chance to voice opinions and see where we were going ( Sounds like option 3 is still the favorable direction. This is going to be a really big exercise, lifting the content out of the re

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Alex, Likewise for option 3. If I recall correctly from the summit session that was also the main preference in the room? On 2 June 2017 at 11:15, George Mihaiescu wrote: > +1 for option 3 > > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I haven’t had any fe

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread George Mihaiescu
+1 for option 3 > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the > OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to > hear people’s opinions on this matter. > > To

Re: [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Thompson
Hi Alexandra, I have always been in favour of having operations guides separate from an administration guide although there needs to be a lot of cross reference. IMHO, operations guides should have commands and instructions on how to diagnose and remedy issues of a running installation. Ad

[Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Alexandra Settle
Hi everyone, I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to hear people’s opinions on this matter. To recap: 1. Option one: Kill the Operations Guide completely and move the Administratio