Mark's faster than me as usual - I was going to suggest the same :)
There's one other subtly to throw in which is the fact that the paid
ticket price need not be static - instead name your price.
To me, this is a great way to get some opportunistic income, without
affecting the accessibility.
On 2015-07-07 15:15:35 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
There's one other subtly to throw in which is the fact that the paid
ticket price need not be static - instead name your price.
[...]
This is sort of what DebConf does, except they provide some
suggested registration fees for
On 7 July 2015 at 15:22, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-07 15:15:35 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
There's one other subtly to throw in which is the fact that the paid
ticket price need not be static - instead name your price.
[...]
This is sort of what DebConf
As a suggestion re free / paid registration: have tiered tickets, like the
Community Leadership Summit does.
Having a free ticket vs a paid ticket would not grant more or less
access or privileges at the event, but gives the opportunity for people
who can expense a ticket to do so.
--
Mark
I've never worked with an organisation that would willingly pay for a
ticket if there were free ones on the table, the ones often included in
sponsorship deals are even used first.
Just the idea of splitting by those that 'can' expense it seems odd to me.
There must surely be some sort of other
The operator summit is about hearing from the operators and allowing them to
exchange information (solutions, observations, complaints...) and provide input
to the devs. I feel it is best to hear from as many operators as possible.
Therefore the size of the summit should not be limited. A venue
