[Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Eren Türkay
Hello operators, I am wondering if anyone is using different versions of Openstack in different sites. We have our first site which is Juno, and we are now having another site where we are planning to deploy Kilo. Does anyone have experience with different versions of installation? Particularly,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Jonathan Proulx
Juno clients with Kilo endpoints are fine. We recently upgraded from Juno to Kilo and many of our clients (including Horizon) are still Juno with no problems. We also had a Kilo Horizon (for testing) running against Juno endpoints prior to the upgrade and that seemed to work as well but it wasn't

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Eren Türkay
On 26-08-2015 17:17, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > We recently upgraded from Juno to Kilo and many of our clients > (including Horizon) are still Juno with no problems. Great news. That's our use case. We will have Juno clients and Kilo API endpoints. Thank you for your help. -- Eren Türkay, System

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/26/2015 9:30 AM, Eren Türkay wrote: On 26-08-2015 17:17, Jonathan Proulx wrote: We recently upgraded from Juno to Kilo and many of our clients (including Horizon) are still Juno with no problems. Great news. That's our use case. We will have Juno clients and Kilo API endpoints. Thank

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread David Medberry
Hi Eren, I'm pretty sure NECTaR is doing diff versions at different sites in a widely distributed way. https://www.openstack.org/user-stories/nectar/ I've cc'd Sam as well. He's your man. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Eren Türkay wrote: > Hello operators, > > I am wondering if anyone is us

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread David Medberry
and we generally run a much newer Horizon and Keystone than the rest of the services. We had Horizon and Keystone on POST KILO (master after Kilo released) while still running Juno on all other services. Worked fine. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM, David Medberry wrote: > Hi Eren, > > I'm pret

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Matthias Runge
On 26/08/15 19:11, David Medberry wrote: > and we generally run a much newer Horizon and Keystone than the rest of > the services. We had Horizon and Keystone on POST KILO (master after > Kilo released) while still running Juno on all other services. Worked fine. Horizon used to work cross version

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-26 Thread Sam Morrison
Yeah we run a multitude of versions at the same time. We usually run N and N-1 in the same env but have also done N-2 (eg. Havana, Icehouse and Juno) Currently we are mainly Juno (keystone, heat, ceilometer, cinder) with a couple of icehouse things lying around. We are in the progress of upgradi

Re: [Openstack-operators] Juno and Kilo Interoperability

2015-08-27 Thread Eren Türkay
Hello Sam and David, Thank your for the responses, I really appreciate them. > With clients the only issue I’ve had is with the designate client not being > backwards compatible between icehouse and juno. Ceilometer changed the way > they signed messaged between Icehouse and Juno which was a pai