-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/24/15 2:14 PM, David Medberry wrote:
> Tim, thanks for pointing out the User Committee. You are the second (or
> third) one to mention that to me in this context and is another great
> way to influence the direction OpenStack takes (and goes ha
Tim, thanks for pointing out the User Committee. You are the second (or
third) one to mention that to me in this context and is another great way
to influence the direction OpenStack takes (and goes hand in hand with this
operator's list, the midcycle, and operator's summit meetings.)
-d
_
> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
> Sent: 24 November 2015 17:56
> To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Operational Director?
>
> Edgar Magana wrote:
> > Is the Foundatio
Edgar Magana wrote:
> Is the Foundation aware of that? I mean you comment about "It's the
> cumulative voting system that is broken”
>
> Maybe this is a good opportunity for fixing it!
Oh sure, it's a well-known issue, which (as far as I know) is
periodically discussed by the Board of Directors.
Tierry,
Is the Foundation aware of that? I mean you comment about "It's the cumulative
voting system that is broken”
Maybe this is a good opportunity for fixing it!
Edgar
On 11/24/15, 3:06 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>matt wrote:
>> it's a voted position. there just aren't that many oper
Worth trying for sure.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> matt wrote:
> > it's a voted position. there just aren't that many operators who vote
> > compared to devs and other contributors. to say nothing of
> > non-contributors who sign up for accounts to vote for their c
matt wrote:
> it's a voted position. there just aren't that many operators who vote
> compared to devs and other contributors. to say nothing of
> non-contributors who sign up for accounts to vote for their co-workers.
It wouldn't be as much of an issue if we used Condorcet or STV -- I
would exp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/23/15 2:06 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Yes and Yes and Yes. It is about time to have more operators
> representation in the Board. Let me share something with you all based
> on my personal experience. Individual Directors for the Board is a ver
mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Operational Director?
Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I
don't see that happening. Operators just don't have the voting power the devs
do. Unless someone wants
+1. Operator/user community is large enough for such a representation.
Can you elaborate on operators lacking the power?
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, matt wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I
> don't see that happening. Operators just don't
it's a voted position. there just aren't that many operators who vote
compared to devs and other contributors. to say nothing of
non-contributors who sign up for accounts to vote for their co-workers.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
> +1. Operator/user community is lar
Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I
don't see that happening. Operators just don't have the voting power the
devs do. Unless someone wants to spam their own corp backers for voting
support ( not really ethical, though obviously being done ).
-Matt
On Mon,
Hi all,
Isn't it time to get an operational director--or rather another/additional
operators as directors? I've nominated a few (unnamed here) and you may be
interested in nominationg others. Look for the email with subject line:
Notice of meeting to elect Individual Directors
13 matches
Mail list logo
