y ;)
BR,
Konstantin
-Original Message-
From: gustavo panizzo (gfa) [mailto:g...@zumbi.com.ar]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 5:43 PM
To: Volenbovskyi Kostiantyn, INI-ON-FIT-CXD-ELC
Cc: tim.b...@cern.ch; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Tunin
lly, moving janitor and cache to the SSD while we have backend
> replication in HDD.
>
> Still way too early for formal report but remind me in a couple of months.
>
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> *From: *Tim Bell
> *Date: *Friday, August 5, 2016 at 3:44 AM
> *To: *open
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:09:50PM +, kostiantyn.volenbovs...@swisscom.com
wrote:
> 3) The question of cfq vs. deadline vs. noop scheduler (apparently both
> in guest and host) where decision should be based on
> workloads/recommendations of OS vendor (/which again might be
> release-
at 3:44 AM
To: openstack-operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Tuning I/O with SSDs
Has anyone a good recipe for improving I/O performance when the hypervisor has
SSDs ?
The configuration is CentOS 7 for guest and hypervisor with KVM.
Tim
based on workloads/recommendations of
OS vendor (/which again might be release-dependent).
BR.
Konstantin
From: Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 12:44 PM
To: openstack-operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Tuning I/O with SSDs
Has anyone a good recipe for
Has anyone a good recipe for improving I/O performance when the hypervisor has
SSDs ?
The configuration is CentOS 7 for guest and hypervisor with KVM.
Tim
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.opens
