Just wanted to mention in this context that those of us with GPFS
backing stores need RAW to allow copy-on-write image and volume
creation.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25/10/15 23:57, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
>>On
On 25/10/15 23:57, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:42:53AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
>> Always having ephemeral disks as raw might make sense given that there
>> is going to be little overlap with others (and therefore the qcow2
>> benefits are not
> Cc: Marc Heckmann <marc.heckm...@ubisoft.com>; openstack-
> > operat...@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] raw ephemeral disks and qcow2 images
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:21:23AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
> > >
> > > On 22/10/
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:21:23AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> On 22/10/15 20:01, "Marc Heckmann" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 08:17 -0700, Abel Lopez wrote:
> >> I've actually looked for this for our RBD backed ephemeral instances,
> >> but found the
> -Original Message-
> From: Kashyap Chamarthy [mailto:kcham...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 23 October 2015 12:37
> To: Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch>
> Cc: Marc Heckmann <marc.heckm...@ubisoft.com>; openstack-
> operat...@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operato
Has anyone had experience with setting up Nova with KVM so it has raw
ephemeral disks but qcow2 images for the VMs ? We've got very large
ephemeral disks and could benefit from the performance of raw volumes for
this.
Tim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature