Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

+1 to " If there are no contributors for an LTS release, there will be no LTS release. If there *are* contributors, then we'll find a way to make some sort of LTS model work within the other constraints we have." +1 to let's get some folks who are interested a place to collaborate and talk to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-11-11 08:41:15 -0800: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-11-10 13:11:45 -0500: > > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-11-08 23:15:15 -0800: > > > Excerpts from Samuel Cassiba's message of 2017-11-08 08:27:12 -0800: > > > > On Tue,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2017-11-10 14:51:08 -0800: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: > > > Hello Ops folks, > > > > This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very > > productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On 11/08/2017 05:27 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > ie. deployment-focused development > teams already under a crunch as contributor count continues to decline > in favor of other projects inside and out of OpenStack. Did you even think that one of the reason for such a decline, is that OpenStack is

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-11-10 13:11:45 -0500: > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-11-08 23:15:15 -0800: > > Excerpts from Samuel Cassiba's message of 2017-11-08 08:27:12 -0800: > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Erik McCormick > > >