Re: [Openstack-operators] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack

Just do a vote as usual, train is a great candidate :) On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:44 PM Melvin Hillsman wrote: > I agree with Anita and wonder why Train did not meet the criteria? If > there is no way for Train to be an option outside of killing the voting, > than for the sake of integrity of

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Capturing Feedback/Input

big +1, really look forward to the storyboard setup On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:31 AM Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > During the TC meeting at the PTG we discussed the ideal way to capture > user-centric feedback; particular from our various groups like SIGs, WGs, > etc. > > Options

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Thanks Anita, will definitely do as you kindly suggested :) On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 12:04 PM Anita Kuno wrote: > On 2018-09-18 08:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > [...] > >> I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

cc'ed sig list. Kind reminder for the meeting about 2 and half hours away, we will do a review of the denver ptg summary [0] and then go over the forum sessions which we want to propose [1] This is an EU/APAC friendly meeting so please do join us if you are in the region :)

Re: [Openstack-operators] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Just a quick update, the execution part of the proposal has been added in patch-2 , so if you have the similar concern shared in Matt's open letter , please help review and comment. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 5:51 PM Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi, > > Based upon the discussion we had at the T

[Openstack-operators] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Hi, Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into governance. It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not thought through the execution method yet to make sure the outcome), but feel

[Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Hi all, Follow up the diversity discussion we had in the tc session this morning [0], I've proposed a resolution on facilitating technical community in large to engage in global reachout for OpenStack more efficiently. Your feedbacks are welcomed. Whether this should be a new resolution or not

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [openstack-dev] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Fox, Kevin M wrote: > How about stated this way, > Its the tc's responsibility to get it done. Either by delegating the > activity, or by doing it themselves. But either way, it needs to get done. > Its a ball that has been dropped too much in OpenStacks history.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-09-12 09:47:27 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > [...] > > So I encourage all elected TC members to work directly with the > > various SIGs to figure out their top issue and then work on > > managing those deliverables across

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

Well Public Cloud WG has prepared the ammo as you know and to discuss with TC on Friday :) A hundred percent with you on this matter. On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:47 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > Rather than take a tangent on Kristi's candidacy thread [1], I'll bring > this up separately. > > Kristi

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Asia-EU friendly meeting today

Hi team, A kind reminder for the UTC 7:00 meeting today, please do remember to register yourself to irc due to new channel policy. ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]New Meeting Time Starting This Week

Hi Folks, As indicated in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584389/, PCWG is moving towards a tick-tock meeting arrangements to better accommodate participants along the globe. For even weeks starting this Wed, we will have a new meeting time on UTC0700. For odd weeks we will remain for the

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]KubeCon EU Public Cloud Meetup ?

Hi, I'm wondering for people who will attend KubeCon EU is there any interest for a public cloud meetup ? We could discuss many items listed in the ptg summary I just sent out via the meetup :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies

[Openstack-operators] Public Cloud WG PTG Summary

Hi team, Sorry for this long overdue summary. During the Dublin PTG as a WG we held two successful discussion sessions on Mon and Tues, and below are the conclusions for this year's planning as far as I could recall. Please feel free to provide further feedback :) - Passport Program v2

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

In hindsight, it would be much fun the R release named Ramm :P On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Hi everybody! > > As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". > As > been with previous elections this wasn't the first

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [keystone] [oslo] new unified limit library

This is certainly a feature will make Public Cloud providers very happy :) On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > Sorry, I remember more detail now... it was using the 'owner' of the VM as > part of the policy rather than quota. > > Is there a per-user/per-group

[Openstack-operators] [tc][ltm]Long Term Maintenance mode discussion

Hi operators, users and public cloud providers, I would like to draw your attention to a discussion[0] happening now on the Technical Committee side about introducing a resolution on how to better provide long term maintenance for stable branches. As I understand this is a widely desired feature

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder for todays meeting

shall we cancel the meeting for today then ? On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Tobias Rydberg wrote: > Hi, > > It's maybe time for a new doodle about bi-weekly meeting ... potentially > also about going to weekly meeting? > > Personally I'm fine with morning times as well,

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Rocky PTG Planning Etherpad

Hi Team, I drafted an initial framework of the etherpad we could use for Rocky PTG in Dublin. You are more than welcomed to provide input: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg-ptg-rocky -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Public Cloud Feature List Hackathon Day 2

Hi Folks, Today we are gonna continue to comb through the public cloud feature list[0] as we did yesterday. Please join the discussion at #openstack-publiccloud starting from UTC1400. [0]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mf8OAyTzZxCKzYHMgBl-QK_2- XSycSkOjqCyMTIedkA/edit?usp=sharing --

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Reminder for team meeting today

Hi Team, This is a reminder for our meeting today Mar 29th, 2017 1400 UTC in IRC channel #openstack-meeting-3 Etherpad and agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Public Cloud WG Boston Forum Brainstorming CFP

Hi Devs, We in the Public Cloud WG is now drafting our Boston Forum session at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-boston-forum-session, if you are interested in public cloud implementation or want to share some past experience or best practices, you are more than welcome to add your

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Atlanta Virtual PTG agenda

A reminder for our virtual meetup tomorrow on irc,starting at 9:00 am ET On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team, > > Please find an initial draft of our virtual ptg on Thursday at > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Atlanta Virtual PTG agenda

Hi team, Please find an initial draft of our virtual ptg on Thursday at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-atlanta-ptg , feel free to add anything that you want to discuss -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]Biweekly Team Meeting 2017.02.15 Agenda

Hi Team, This is a reminder for our next meeting on Feb 15th, 2017 1400 UTC in IRC channel #openstack-meeting-3 Etherpad and agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Doodle poll closed for chair elections

Thanks Matt for your leadership for the WG. Let's work together to build a strong and great working group :) On Jan 13, 2017 6:33 PM, "Matt Jarvis" wrote: > Hello All > > I've just closed the poll to elect the chairs for the Public Cloud working > group. The results can

Re: [Openstack-operators] Austin Summit Ops Day - Kuryr and Containers Networking

would be great to have a general container related session on Ops Day :) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello All, > > Project Kuryr [1] is relatively a new OpenStack project that aims at > simplifying and improving > the way we deploy and manage

Re: [Openstack-operators] [tags] June Monthly Meeting

IRC is better On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Proulx j...@jonproulx.com wrote: Definitely think IRC is the way to go for same reasons others have stated On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote: Hi all, As agreed at the summit, let's have a monthly