Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Certifying SDKs

2017-12-15 Thread Melvin Hillsman
+1 to editing the sheet as well and because you are spot on with your assessment of what I meant; scenarios we can “guarantee” an SDK allows/affords a tool to deliver on. -- Kind regards, Melvin Hillsman mrhills...@gmail.com mobile: +1 (832) 264-2646 irc: mrhillsman On 12/15/17, 1:53 PM,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Certifying SDKs

2017-12-15 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Joe, +1 to edit the sheet directly. Thanks, Dims On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been meaning to reply to this thread. Volodymyr, your reply reminded me > :) > > I agree with what you said that the SDK should support everything that the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Certifying SDKs

2017-12-15 Thread Joe Topjian
Hi all, I've been meaning to reply to this thread. Volodymyr, your reply reminded me :) I agree with what you said that the SDK should support everything that the API supports. In that way, one could simply review the API reference docs and create a checklist for each possible action. I've often

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Certifying SDKs

2017-12-14 Thread Volodymyr Litovka
Hi Melvin, isn't SDK the same as Openstack REST API? In my opinion (can be erroneous, though), SDK should just support everything that API supports, providing some basic checks of parameters (e.g. verify compliancy of passed parameter to IP address format, etc) before calling API (in order