Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-11-11 12:19:56 -0500: > Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2017-11-10 14:51:08 -0800: > > On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: > > > > > Hello Ops folks, > > > > > > This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-11 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2017-11-10 14:51:08 -0800: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: > > > Hello Ops folks, > > > > This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very > > productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-10 Thread Saverio Proto
The 1 year release cycle makes a lot of sense to me too. +1 Saverio ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-10 Thread Samuel Cassiba
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > What I heard from ops in the room is that they want (to start) one release a > year who's branch isn't deleted after a year. What if that's exactly what we > did? I propose that OpenStack only do one release a year instead of

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-10 Thread Jonathan Mills
"I propose that OpenStack only do one release a year instead of two.” I am all too happy to chime in and second (or third, or fourth) this notion. It is extremely challenging for many kinds of organizations (government, industry) to keep pace with the two releases per year model. I think it

Re: [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-10 Thread John Dickinson
On 7 Nov 2017, at 15:28, Erik McCormick wrote: > Hello Ops folks, > > This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very > productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past > releases available and maintained for a longer period of time (LTS). > > There was

[Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

2017-11-07 Thread Erik McCormick
Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and maintained for a longer period of time (LTS). There was agreement in the room that this could be accomplished by