Folks, there are already a number of proposals for sessions that can be
seen at http://summit.openstack.org/. I will be reviewing them early
next week so I encourage any one who wants to lead a session, or has a
topic that should be discussed, to make a proposal at that page. If you
want to
We discussed this a bit at the meeting today. Monty has proposed a
session on the QA track about parallelizing some of the CI stuff. He
believes tempest could share the parallelization code. See
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/69.
Parallelizing the tempest gate job is as much of a ci
Agreed. Daryl, is there a list of these issues some where?
On 9/27/2012 10:54 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
I'm certainly all for anything that makes things easier. However, I do want to
make sure that if we migrate runners, we should make sure that the new
implementation solves all the issues
3 matches
Mail list logo
