: Thursday, September 27, 2012 8:11 PM
To: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-qa-team] PyVows proof of concept
We discussed this a bit at the meeting today. Monty has proposed a
session on the QA track about parallelizing some of the CI stuff. He
believes tempest could
___
> From:
> openstack-qa-team-bounces+daryl.walleck=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
> [openstack-qa-team-bounces+daryl.walleck=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net]
> on behalf of Jaroslav Henner [jhen...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:28 AM
>
k=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[openstack-qa-team-bounces+daryl.walleck=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on
behalf of Jaroslav Henner [jhen...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:28 AM
To: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack-qa-team] PyVows proof of concept
In re
Monday, September 24, 2012 7:28 AM
To: openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack-qa-team] PyVows proof of concept
In reply to:
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-qa-team/msg00236.html, which
didn't came to my mailbox for some reason (attachment?)
I tried pyVows myself. I ki
On 09/20/2012 03:16 PM, Daryl Walleck wrote:
Hi all,
At last week's meeting we were discussing the limitations of nose as a
test runner, and entertaining the idea of switching to a more
appropriate test runner. I had mentioned that I had an proof of concept
test suite laying around for a runner
In reply to:
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-qa-team/msg00236.html, which
didn't came to my mailbox for some reason (attachment?)
I tried pyVows myself. I kinda liked the concept, but I didn't like the
way it is reporting to JUnit format XML when using "generative testing":
http://heyne
6 matches
Mail list logo
