Re: [Openstack-qa-team] A Tempest run results

On Fri, Apr 13 2012, Daryl Walleck wrote: > Speaking to this: > >> - ERROR: An update server request for another user's server should fail >> >> seems to be raised because it raises InstanceNotFound and returns a >> 500 HTTP error code. > > If this is occurring, this is a Nova defect/regressi

Re: [Openstack-qa-team] A Tempest run results

I submitted a fix for the markers problem on the essex stable branch and now all the tests (almost) pass using the real essex release. The only issue was a non-reproducible failure. I ran this a dozen more times and did not see it again :-( . So be on the watch for this. ==

Re: [Openstack-qa-team] A Tempest run results

Speaking to this: > - ERROR: An update server request for another user's server should fail > > seems to be raised because it raises InstanceNotFound and returns a > 500 HTTP error code. If this is occurring, this is a Nova defect/regression. No AuthZ test should ever be failing with a 500.