On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 07:58:18AM +1000, Peter Flodin wrote:
> In Google Calendar I got:
>
> No calendars found matching openSUSE.
Yes, Google needs some time to index the pages. Even when they are hosted on
their own systems.
Robert
--
Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Tim Harper wrote:
...
>> That should at least upgrade all of your packges to the version of the next
>> distro. I've upgraded many a times fedora core from an entire number to the
>> next via yum, I don't see
On 4/14/06, Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> now that Google calendar went public I created a calendar with openSUSE
> related dates. You can find the calendar as an RSS feed under
>
> http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/public/basic
>
> as iCal cale
On Thursday 13 April 2006 15:30, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Let's say that the compiler changes between releases, and the foo
> oackage gets rebuilt. Now, foo's source and packaging didn't change, so
> the version and release number don't change either. However, the
> contents did change.
Also, why would
On Thursday 13 April 2006 15:30, Jon Nelson wrote:
> One very good reason is that sometimes the version (and package) number
> of a package between betas (or rc's) and final may not change but the
> actual content may.
>
> What I mean is this: let's say you have a package 'foo' version 1.0,
> relea
On Thursday 13 April 2006 15:30, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Why oh *why* would you disable gpgcheck?
Because I don't know where to get the gpg key, and I don't want to take the
time to figure that out right now :P
Want to shed some enlightenment on the subject?
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Tim Harper wrote:
> If you can find the RPM repository, you could just create a yum repository
> file in /etc/yum.repos/suse-base to a install source (a url that contains the
> repodata folder)
>
> For example:
>
> [suse-base]
> name=suse-base
> baseurl=http://ftp.opensuse
If you can find the RPM repository, you could just create a yum repository
file in /etc/yum.repos/suse-base to a install source (a url that contains the
repodata folder)
For example:
[suse-base]
name=suse-base
baseurl=http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/
Hi everybody,
now that Google calendar went public I created a calendar with openSUSE
related dates. You can find the calendar as an RSS feed under
http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/public/basic
as iCal calendar under
http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/p
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 16:21 schrieb Marcel Mourguiart:
> But only have the versions of KDE and Gnome, I have this announcement too
> http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-announce/2006-Apr/0002.html
I meant
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=suse
There you will find versi
On 4/13/06, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> question about the content of the distro are very frequent.
> The answer as to look at the index file is acurate but not
> handy.
>
> so we need a tool to show the list of available packages,
> the version, this for any distro (at least stable and
> curr
Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
> Just looked at my torrents, and see the greatest traffic ever on my
> three seeders. Well over 200 peers on each machine making over 3MB/s
I see 369 clients :-) and got the 1cd right now (4 hours?)
and the others are near :-)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dod
Hello,
Just looked at my torrents, and see the greatest traffic ever on my
three seeders. Well over 200 peers on each machine making over 3MB/s
traffic. So: please leave your torrent client running for this night and
also for the weekend, especially if that machine is at a well networked
place, lik
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:03:47PM +0200, jdd wrote:
> but are there only 174 packages in SUSE?
Yes, what makes you think there are more. :-D
Off to the pub. makeSUSEdvd seems to work. I need a drink. RC1 look great
BTW.
houghi
--
Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> distrowatch.com does exactly that.
thanks, I didn't know that :-)
but are there only 174 packages in SUSE?
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
--
distrowatch.com does exactly that.
On 4/13/06, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> question about the content of the distro are very frequent.
> The answer as to look at the index file is acurate but not
> handy.
>
> so we need a tool to show the list of available packages,
> the version, this for an
question about the content of the distro are very frequent.
The answer as to look at the index file is acurate but not
handy.
so we need a tool to show the list of available packages,
the version, this for any distro (at least stable and
current dev version).
I don't think the wiki is the place f
On 4/13/06, houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:21:35AM -0400, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
> > But is there a page with a little more information ? I'm sure i have seen
> > some where whats new in suse 10.1 but i can't found it know.
>
> You can use either INDEX.gz or ARCHIV
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:21:35AM -0400, Marcel Mourguiart wrote:
> But is there a page with a little more information ? I'm sure i have seen
> some where whats new in suse 10.1 but i can't found it know.
You can use either INDEX.gz or ARCHIVES.gz and then look up the
differences in at least vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
houghi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>> Note that the same can be achieved with YaST2, but needs some trickery,
>> because neither YaST2 nor y2pmsh have an "update" operation that
>> refreshes all sources:
>
>
Hi,
Also can you go from 10.1 RC1 to 10.1 final by just doing and online
update using YAST?
Thanks
Rene
Thomas Börkel wrote:
HI!
Is it already known, if I will be able to update a 10.1 RC1 installation
to 10.1 final (when available) by simply updating all changed RPMs?
Thanks!
Thomas
HI!
Is it already known, if I will be able to update a 10.1 RC1 installation
to 10.1 final (when available) by simply updating all changed RPMs?
Thanks!
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
On 4/13/06, Daniel Bertolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 16:07 schrieb Marcel Mourguiart:
> > Is there a place, where i can see what on SUSE 10.1 RC1 ??
>
> http://www.distrowatch.com
>
> Dani
Thanks,
But only have the versions of KDE and Gnome, I have this announc
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 16:07 schrieb Marcel Mourguiart:
> Is there a place, where i can see what on SUSE 10.1 RC1 ??
http://www.distrowatch.com
Dani
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
On 4/13/06, Rasmus Plewe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Mathias Homann wrote:
> >
> > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/72004 says: "KDE 3.5.1"...
> >
> > is that true?
>
> Yes.
>
> > not 3.5.2?
>
> No.
>
>
> Rasmus
Is there a place, where i can see
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Mathias Homann wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/72004 says: "KDE 3.5.1"...
>
>
> is that true? not 3.5.2?
Also a pity they name a server directly and not use download.opensuse.org.
Somebody who can mail them and ask t
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Mathias Homann wrote:
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/72004 says: "KDE 3.5.1"...
>
> is that true?
Yes.
> not 3.5.2?
No.
Rasmus
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello all,
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/72004 says: "KDE 3.5.1"...
is that true? not 3.5.2?
bye,
MH
--
Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1
UWG und §823 I
BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin vom 2.8.1998 Az: 16 O 201/98). Jede kommerzielle
houghi wrote:
> For wich I am gratefull. I do not want to do any update or upgrade,
always confusing. we speak of update of _inst_source_, not
distribution...
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.ph
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:39:14PM +0800, Li Hong wrote:
To unsubscribe, read the message below this:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Note that the same can be achieved with YaST2, but needs some trickery,
> because neither YaST2 nor y2pmsh have an "update" operation that
> refreshes all sources:
For wich I am gratefull. I do not want to do any update or upgrade, e
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> If you don't believe me, try it ;)
I _do_ beleive you :-). but I'm used to try to stay with the
defaults operation when possible.
when changing frequently of distribution, computers, users,
it's much simpler to use the standard tools.
only when I really need state of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd wrote:
> Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> smart comes at the expense of using a lot of memory though, as it loads
>> a lot of repository metadata to be so "smart".
>
> is that to say that the awfull time lost at each launch
> "refreshing the source" is
Matt Rajca schrieb:
> What do I do first? I install Suse, then how do I boot to the OS to get the
> driver? Do i use the old Video Card? How did you do it
>
I think we are a little bit OT here. This type of question belongs to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> smart comes at the expense of using a lot of memory though, as it loads
> a lot of repository metadata to be so "smart".
is that to say that the awfull time lost at each launch
"refreshing the source" is even longer? I hate this.
>
> Let me pick one example: smart never,
35 matches
Mail list logo
