Re: [opensuse] Re: CPU reviews or comparisons for the average Linux user?

2007-02-26 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Monday 26 February 2007 01:37, John Andersen wrote: > On Monday 26 February 2007, Martin Mielke wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > you might find this chart interesting: > > > > http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts > >_2005/pa ge39.html > > Nope. Too old. I don't think an

Re: [opensuse] Re: CPU reviews or comparisons for the average Linux user?

2007-02-26 Thread John Andersen
On Monday 26 February 2007, Martin Mielke wrote: > Hi all, > > you might find this chart interesting: > > http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/pa >ge39.html Nope. Too old. I don't think any of those chips are still in production. -- __

Re: [opensuse] Re: CPU reviews or comparisons for the average Linux user?

2007-02-26 Thread Martin Mielke
Hi all, you might find this chart interesting: http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/page39.html Cheers, Martin It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts wi

Re: [opensuse] Re: CPU reviews or comparisons for the average Linux user?

2007-02-24 Thread John Andersen
On Saturday 24 February 2007, Eberhard Roloff wrote: > Dual-Core 64-bit Whoppie runs Kcalc, emacs or apache faster than > > > my ailing P4 3.2 Ghz. Most of them focus on gaming, 3D, floating point > > intensive Windows applications. Its all faster. A rising tide lifts all boats. A P4 3.2 is no sl

[opensuse] Re: CPU reviews or comparisons for the average Linux user?

2007-02-24 Thread Eberhard Roloff
Jonathan Wilson wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm trying to find some useful reviews comparing CPUs (hopefully a broad > selection, not just the 3 latest out of any given factory) for the average > Linux office-progam desktop user. > > Reviews that take the 2 very latest Intel and AMD DualCores and com