Richard Creighton wrote:
>>> Actually, M$ have recently announced that they are extending support for
>>> XP, for some unknown reason people are not buying as many Vista copies
>>> as M$ expected :-)
>>>
>> Few hundreds reasons per product.
>> Count is mostly 2 (Vista & MS Office) which comes
Per Jessen wrote:
> Richard Creighton wrote:
>
>> I cranked up 10.2 on a
>> 486DX-2 the other day just to see it run...slow, but it ran :)
>
> How exactly did you manage that? Have you got a 486-version of 10.2?
>
> I've got a 486DX2 machine running as firewall/gateway, but it's stuck on
> Su
Eberhard Roloff wrote:
> I fully aggree.
>
> But, as sad as it is, as a matter of fact, you cannot buy a new computer
> without vista anymore. There are exceptions and there are business
> machines that you still can order with XP, but in general, the new PC
> market "is vista".
>
> In consequence
James Knott wrote:
> Actually, there are many vendors who will sell without Windows or with
> Linux installed. For example, there's one company, located near my
> home, that sells computers loaded with Linux or no OS, for less than the
> same system with Windows.
Indeed. Since we're "Microsoft G
Eberhard Roloff wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> Richard Creighton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I cranked up 10.2 on a
>>> 486DX-2 the other day just to see it run...slow, but it ran :)
>>>
>> How exactly did you manage that? Have you got a 486-version of 10.2?
>>
>> I've got a 486DX2 machine
