Per Jessen wrote:
>> Hey, I'm all for it but I really don't think it is very likely in
>> practice, as much as I hate to admit it.
>>
>
> Oh, I doubt it too. 486s are now found mostly in embedded stuff, and
> there are other distros catering for that market. My own 486 firewall
> machine r
Richard Creighton wrote:
> What I hope and pray doesn't happen is that those that make the
> decisions don't forget the roots and start making more changes that
> obsolete older equipment just because it is older equipment.
Couldn't agree more.
> Change, for change sake is not always the bes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-10-01 at 17:51 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
That one has yet to bite me - but as we're mostly SCSI anyway, it might
not have much impact :-)
No, the majority of machines probably are SATA or PATA, not really SCSI.
- --
Cheers,
2007/10/1, Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> The Monday 2007-10-01 at 17:51 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> > That one has yet to bite me - but as we're mostly SCSI anyway, it might
> > not have much impact :-)
>
> No, the majority of machines pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-10-01 at 17:21 -0300, Gabriel . wrote:
Don't worry, we already received your mail twice ;)
Not everybody, I hope ;-)
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Mad
Richard Creighton wrote:
>> Uh, I'm not sure I can quite follow you. If the openSUSE project
>> built the distro for the 386 instruction set, the old 486 machines
>> would still work fine.
>>
>>
> However, I am pretty sure the project has not been built with that
> instruction set in mind.
T
