On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:32, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> > I have a similar situation with 146060: I've been unable to install
> > beta2 or beta3 on several machines with these same symptoms, but I
> > can't tell from the bug report if it's invalid, wont
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Each individual looking at a bugreport might misjudge it - or see it
> > differently than you. With the number of bugreports this can happen
> > quite often, so please don't feel offended. If y
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Each individual looking at a bugreport might misjudge it - or see it
> differently than you. With the number of bugreports this can happen
> quite often, so please don't feel offended. If you disagree, you can
> reopen it yourself or ask
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Each individual looking at a bugreport might misjudge it - or see it
> differently than you. With the number of bugreports this can happen
> quite often, so please don't feel offended.
Oh no, definitely not - just confused :-)
> If you disagree, you can reopen it your
Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Occasionally I'm a little confused wrt to responses I get in bugreports.
> Some support people appear to be primarily concerned with fixing my
> problem or helping me find a work-around, whereas I'm generally
> reporting problems as feedback on the beta-rel
Occasionally I'm a little confused wrt to responses I get in bugreports.
Some support people appear to be primarily concerned with fixing my
problem or helping me find a work-around, whereas I'm generally
reporting problems as feedback on the beta-release(s). I was just
today pointing out a regres
