On Tuesday 30 October 2007 18:47:28 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Another cookie:
>
> int p = 0;
> int *x = &p;
>
> int main(void)
> {
> *p = 1337;
> }
>
> yields (for both 64-bit and 64-bit PIC):
>
> 400510: 48 8b 05 11 0b 20 00mov 2099985(%r
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 18:47:28 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Oct 30 2007 10:20, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >On Tuesday 30 October 2007 09:42, Russell Jones wrote:
> >> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 30 October 2007 08:58, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >> >> * BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 18:47 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Even if you use a "36-bit" PAE kernel, it can only give a process
> a 32-bit address space.
> You want at least a 64-bit kernel. Everyone does that on SUN processors
> even though 64 bitisms are more expensive there.
You suggest that it w
On Oct 30 2007 10:20, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>On Tuesday 30 October 2007 09:42, Russell Jones wrote:
>> Randall R Schulz wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 30 October 2007 08:58, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>> >> * BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-30-07 11:54]:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> > But why? Do you run applica
