Hi Folks
Did someone get Thomson ADSL Modem SpeedTouch 536i v6 working ?
thanks
Friendly Greetings
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, 26 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> Hi Folks
>
> Did someone get Thomson ADSL Modem SpeedTouch 536i v6 working ?
I use a 546i (4 ethernet ports, no USB). Worked out of the box,
including ipv6 prot 41 tunnel.
Theo
--
Theo v. WerkhovenRegistered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.
On Fri 26 Jan 2007 22:42, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> I use a 546i (4 ethernet ports, no USB). Worked out of the box,
> including ipv6 prot 41 tunnel.
___
Hello, Theo
- thank you, that IS interesting.
My SuSE vers is: 10.1 - am trying to use USB to connect modem to mah
Puter
-
On Friday 26 January 2007 22:42, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> Fri, 26 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > Did someone get Thomson ADSL Modem SpeedTouch 536i v6 working ?
>
> I use a 546i (4 ethernet ports, no USB). Worked out of the box,
> including ipv6 prot 41 tunnel.
>
> Theo
> -
Sat, 27 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Friday 26 January 2007 22:42, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > Fri, 26 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > Hi Folks
> > >
> > > Did someone get Thomson ADSL Modem SpeedTouch 536i v6 working ?
> >
> > I use a 546i (4 ethernet ports, no USB). Worked out of
Sat, 27 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Fri 26 Jan 2007 22:42, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > I use a 546i (4 ethernet ports, no USB). Worked out of the box,
> > including ipv6 prot 41 tunnel.
> ___
>
> Hello, Theo
>
>
> - thank you, that IS interesting.
>
> My SuSE vers is: 1
On Sat 27 Jan 2007 09:45, Peter Nikolic wrote:
> You would be far better off dumping the USB side of things and get
> yourself one that uses an ethernet port and an ethernet card much
> easier in fact almost instant no faffing around with half cooked
> drivers on something that IMHO should be n
On Sat 27 Jan 2007 10:07, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> I totally agree.
> The 536i also has an ethernet port, so OP would be wise to use that.
> OP: The default IP address on the LAN side is 192.168.1.1 IIRC,
> once you've connected to the embedded webserver you can change the
> LAN address and other
On Saturday 27 January 2007 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat 27 Jan 2007 09:45, Peter Nikolic wrote:
> > You would be far better off dumping the USB side of things and get
> > yourself one that uses an ethernet port and an ethernet card much
> > easier in fact almost instant no faffing a
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
> Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
> need anything but a dirt cheap 10megabit card.
Here we have 16MBit ADSL, and I've seen even faster
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:18, Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
> > Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
> > need anything but a dirt cheap 10megabit card.
>
> Here we have 16MBit ADSL, and I've seen even faster
Sheesh!
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:33, John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:18, Anders Johansson wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
> > > Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
> > > need anything but a dirt cheap 10megabit card.
> >
Anders Johansson wrote:
16 Mbps is quite common here in Europe
you miss the scope... I have a theorical 24Mb adsl, but this is only
true inside the telecom house :-)
after that, giving the distance, the speed go down, and fast. at 8 km,
adsl 2+ give just 512Kb, with lick
(I get 10Mb real
Sat, 27 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sat 27 Jan 2007 10:07, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > I totally agree.
> > The 536i also has an ethernet port, so OP would be wise to use that.
> > OP: The default IP address on the LAN side is 192.168.1.1 IIRC,
> > once you've connected to the embedded w
On Saturday 27 January 2007 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat 27 Jan 2007 09:45, Peter Nikolic wrote:
> > You would be far better off dumping the USB side of things and get
> > yourself one that uses an ethernet port and an ethernet card much
> > easier in fact almost instant no faffing a
Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:33, John Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:18, Anders Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
>>>
Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
n
On Saturday 27 January 2007 13:17, jdd wrote:
> Anders Johansson wrote:
> > 16 Mbps is quite common here in Europe
>
> you miss the scope... I have a theorical 24Mb adsl, but this is only
> true inside the telecom house :-)
>
> after that, giving the distance, the speed go down, and fast. at 8 km,
John Andersen wrote:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:18, Anders Johansson wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
>>> need anything but a dirt cheap 10megabit card.
>>>
>> Here we have 16M
Sat, 27 Jan 2007, by [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> John Andersen wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 January 2007 02:18, Anders Johansson wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:09, John Andersen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Considering its going to be connected to an ADSL, you don't
> >>> need anything but a di
On Sat 27 Jan 2007 10:28, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> Dunno, perhaps USB works with the setup program on CD for windows,
> but still (especially in Linux) ethernet is much, much easier to use
> and 1000% more versatile.
> So get yourself a $5 100Mb card, set its address to e.g.
> 192.168.1.10, netma
20 matches
Mail list logo
