I never thought I'd see the day when I'd be required to agree to a MS EULA!
Anyone else think this a bit too much? The window title of the EULA
agreement
was "License Agreement for kernel-2705-patch-message-2 (message).
Is this some kind of early April Fools Day joke?
Terry
--
openSUSE 10.2 (
On Saturday 10 March 2007 23:33, Terry Eck wrote:
> I never thought I'd see the day when I'd be required to agree to a MS EULA!
> Anyone else think this a bit too much? The window title of the EULA
> agreement
> was "License Agreement for kernel-2705-patch-message-2 (message).
>
> Is this some kind
Anders Johansson wrote:
EULA? Where are you looking? I don't see a EULA anywhere, either when I run
the update or when I look in the actual patch xml file. I see a message
describing the contents of the patch, just like there has always been for
kernel updates
It appeared in a window titl
On Sunday 11 March 2007 00:06, Terry Eck wrote:
> Anders Johansson wrote:
> >EULA? Where are you looking? I don't see a EULA anywhere, either when I
> > run the update or when I look in the actual patch xml file. I see a
> > message describing the contents of the patch, just like there has always
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-03-11 at 00:16 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> The only EULA I can find is for the Microsoft Truetype fonts
There are a few more:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> locate EULA.html
/usr/share/doc/corefonts/EULA.html
/usr/share/doc/nvidia/EULA.h
On Sunday 11 March 2007 00:34, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> The Sunday 2007-03-11 at 00:16 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
> > The only EULA I can find is for the Microsoft Truetype fonts
>
> There are a few more:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> locate EULA.html
> /usr/share/doc/corefonts/EULA.html
> /usr/share/d
* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-10-07 18:38]:
[...]
> There are a few more:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> locate EULA.html
> /usr/share/doc/corefonts/EULA.html
> /usr/share/doc/nvidia/EULA.html
>
> And a text file:
>
> /usr/share/doc/packages/AdobeICCProfiles/EULA
and:
/home/pat/google-earth
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 11 March 2007 00:34, Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Sunday 2007-03-11 at 00:16 +0100, Anders Johansson wrote:
The only EULA I can find is for the Microsoft Truetype fonts
There are a few more:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> locate EULA.html
/usr/share/doc/core
On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:20, Terry Eck wrote:
...
> As I stated, the Window appeared while I was performing an update (which
> is still being processed).
> There were 5 patches listed: kernel(Security)(noarch), kernel-default,
> kernel-source, yast2-printer, and
> yast2-printer(noarch). The win
On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:34, Rajko M. wrote:
> On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:20, Terry Eck wrote:
> ...
>
> > As I stated, the Window appeared while I was performing an update (which
> > is still being processed).
> > There were 5 patches listed: kernel(Security)(noarch), kernel-default,
> > ker
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:06:06PM -0600, Terry Eck wrote:
> It appeared in a window titled "License Agreement for
> kernel-2705-patch-message-2 (message).
> It contained the words Microsoft and EULA. To proceed, I had to press
> the ACCEPT button.
Too bad it didn't have a "BITE ME" button.
> F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2007-03-10 at 18:40 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> and:
> /home/pat/google-earth/EULA-GoogleEarth-en.txt
> /usr/lib/winetools/doc/EULA_en.ie6.txt
> /usr/share/doc/packages/divx/EULA.txt
> /usr/share/sane/xsane/xsane-eula.txt
>
> :^)
Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:34, Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 18:20, Terry Eck wrote:
...
As I stated, the Window appeared while I was performing an update (which
is still being processed).
There were 5 patches listed: kernel(Security)(noarch), kernel-defa
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 18:20 -0600, Terry Eck wrote:
> Anders Johansson wrote:
>
> As I stated, the Window appeared while I was performing an update (which
> is still being processed).
> There were 5 patches listed: kernel(Security)(noarch), kernel-default,
> kernel-source, yast2-printer, and
>
Tom Patton wrote:
I assume your email signature is not current...what version does your
"uname -a" show?
Tom in NM
The update is still working. It is at 25%. When the update finished I'll
reboot and see what kernel version is being used.
uname -a
Linux linux 2.6.18.2-34-default #1 SMP Mon
On 10 March 07 19:14, Tom Patton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 18:20 -0600, Terry Eck wrote:
> > Anders Johansson wrote:
> >
>
> > As I stated, the Window appeared while I was performing an update (which
> > is still being processed).
> > There were 5 patches listed: kernel(Security)(noarch), k
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:33:22PM -0600, Terry Eck wrote:
> I never thought I'd see the day when I'd be required to agree to a MS EULA!
> Anyone else think this a bit too much? The window title of the EULA
> agreement
> was "License Agreement for kernel-2705-patch-message-2 (message).
>
> Is thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
