Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-21 Thread chika
virtualbox is better than vmware, i ve tried it more light n fast. u should read alexey eremenko for the installation tutorial search on google lessons4lizards-fop.pdf viva virtualbox On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I have a tough

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-20 Thread Chee How Chua
The obvious cantenders for virtualization are: VMware, VirtualBox and Xen (KVM/QEMU does not suitable because it lacks guest OS video acceleration). Can Xen handle OS-heterogenous virtualization? I thought the guest had to be Linux, as well. If the hardware is VT-enabled, you can install

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 14:25, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) wrote: Hi ! I have a tough choice. Client have an Intel-based Quad-Core PC with SuSE 10.3, and time to time (~1 - 1.5 hours day) needs Win XP with Adobe Photoshop, InDesign, Dreamveawer and some weird video editing

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread Greg Freemyer
On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! I have a tough choice. Client have an Intel-based Quad-Core PC with SuSE 10.3, and time to time (~1 - 1.5 hours day) needs Win XP with Adobe Photoshop, InDesign, Dreamveawer and some weird video editing

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread Tom Patton
It's been a year or two back, but Parallels was very stable for me. I see they've won several awards this year, perhaps it should be on your candidate list...? Tom in NM On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 21:10 -0500, Greg Freemyer wrote: On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) [EMAIL

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread Joe Sloan
Tom Patton wrote: It's been a year or two back, but Parallels was very stable for me. I see they've won several awards this year, perhaps it should be on your candidate list...? Just a war story, feel free to disregard - I checked out parallels, which I noticed was at version 3.0 for mac,

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread Tom Patton
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 20:38 -0800, Joe Sloan wrote: Tom Patton wrote: It's been a year or two back, but Parallels was very stable for me. I see they've won several awards this year, perhaps it should be on your candidate list...? Just a war story, feel free to disregard - I checked

Re: [opensuse] Heavy-Duty Virtualization Question

2007-12-19 Thread peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) wrote: The question is - which of these virtualization solutions will offer best performance, especially in terms of graphic/video screen redraw, sound latency, and 3D graphic ? AFAIK XEN doesn't provide no