On Sunday 11 June 2006 00:04, jim tate wrote:
> I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't care
> for Linspires ploy
> of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
Because you don't seem to understand what you're paying for.
You're not paying for the software, y
On Saturday 10 June 2006 17:27, jim tate wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the input, I agree about installing apps in Suse, I can
> get a lot of RH RPMS and install on Suse
> but a lot of times you run into the dreaded dependceny problems.
> What I was refering to was to Suse doesn't give mirrors to down
BandiPat wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 17:04, jim tate wrote:
I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't
care for Linspires ploy
of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but
is 10.1 stabl
On Saturday 10 June 2006 17:04, jim tate wrote:
> I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't
> care for Linspires ploy
> of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
> I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but
> is 10.1 stable enough?
> O
I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't care
for Linspires ploy
of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but is
10.1 stable enough?
Or is 10.0 a better Ideal?
I'am mainly a Fedora user but
