Re: [opensuse] Mirrors (Re: ftp.rz /mirrors/suse/ Updateintervall)

2006-03-08 Thread Christoph Thiel
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote: In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE. I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example. He basically points out: * ISOs are too big,

Re: [opensuse] Mirrors (Re: ftp.rz /mirrors/suse/ Updateintervall)

2006-03-08 Thread houghi
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Christoph Thiel wrote: It's already possible today to do a minimal installation with CD1 and a default GNOME / KDE installation with CD 1-3. Maybe we need to make this more visible within our Beta/RC announcements. We are of course very much

Re: [opensuse] Mirrors (Re: ftp.rz /mirrors/suse/ Updateintervall)

2006-03-08 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Hi, Eberhard Moenkeberg schrieb: On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Siegbert Baude wrote: Christoph Thiel schrieb: On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Andreas Stieger wrote: * on many mirrors, x86_64 packages are found somewhere under i386 I guess what you are referring to is the fact that we share the update

[opensuse] Mirrors (Re: ftp.rz /mirrors/suse/ Updateintervall)

2006-03-07 Thread Andreas Stieger
In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE. I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example. He basically points out: * ISOs are too big, users will download all 5 when they could have done

Re: [opensuse] Mirrors (Re: ftp.rz /mirrors/suse/ Updateintervall)

2006-03-07 Thread Azerion
Op dinsdag 7 maart 2006 19:21, schreef Andreas Stieger: In the status meeting, on the topic of mirrors, I pointed out that our local mirror admin was confused about SUSE and openSUSE. I was asked to cite the relevant parts of the thread as an example. He basically points out: * ISOs are too