Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Michael Folsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I checked Science and Productivity and its not there -
>>
>> However, before we do that - it might be worthwhile to consider what
>> else do we need for clustering? It would be really great to see
>> Open
On 6/15/07, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The new Heartbeat2 with OCFSv2 would be a killer combination in some
future, the only problem with heartbeat2 is the lack of
documentation Maybe adding openSSI we could get something similar
to TruCluster...
Ciro
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
2007/6/15, Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> Alternatively, you can write some custom scripts to share hard disk
> data between nodes, use "webmin" to manage nodes together, and use
> Cisco's NAT with Load Balancing to use b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> Alternatively, you can write some custom scripts to share hard disk
> data between nodes, use "webmin" to manage nodes together, and use
> Cisco's NAT with Load Balancing to use both servers.
Scripts ? to "share" ?
Seems we've
Alternatively, you can write some custom scripts to share hard disk
data between nodes, use "webmin" to manage nodes together, and use
Cisco's NAT with Load Balancing to use both servers.
This should work for basic workloads... such as HTTP server.
I'm not sure how good or bad openSUSE is at "cl
I absolutely agree -
I was just wondering aloud if the inclusion of a few basic tools may
make it an easier choice for the cluster building crowd. There is no
way that any distro could do it all -
M-
On 6/15/07, Thomas Hertweck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Folsom wrote:
> I checked S
Michael Folsom wrote:
> I checked Science and Productivity and its not there -
>
> However, before we do that - it might be worthwhile to consider what
> else do we need for clustering? It would be really great to see
> OpenSuse shipped on clusters of all sizes from the little guys to
> biggies
On 6/15/07, Michael Folsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks!
I checked Science and Productivity and its not there -
However, before we do that - it might be worthwhile to consider what
else do we need for clustering? It would be really great to see
OpenSuse shipped on clusters of all sizes fr
Thanks!
I checked Science and Productivity and its not there -
However, before we do that - it might be worthwhile to consider what
else do we need for clustering? It would be really great to see
OpenSuse shipped on clusters of all sizes from the little guys to
biggies but to make that easy the