Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4

2007-09-15 Thread Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)
Doug McGarrett wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2007 00:24, Tom Patton wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:32 +0200, jdd wrote: >>> Felix Miata wrote: Maybe this time we can get rid of the point release silliness like Fedora did. Call it 11. Call the next 12, and the next 13 >>> true.

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4

2007-09-15 Thread Doug McGarrett
On Saturday 15 September 2007 00:24, Tom Patton wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:32 +0200, jdd wrote: > > Felix Miata wrote: > > > Maybe this time we can get rid of the point release silliness like > > > Fedora did. Call it 11. Call the next 12, and the next 13 > > > > true. the .x should be r

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4

2007-09-14 Thread Tom Patton
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:32 +0200, jdd wrote: > Felix Miata wrote: > > > Maybe this time we can get rid of the point release silliness like Fedora > > did. Call it 11. Call the next 12, and the next 13 > > true. the .x should be reserved to minor fixes (like the second dvd > set recently) >

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-14 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2007-09-14 at 06:13 -0500, Glenn Holmer wrote: > > Why do either of you find this surprising > > > > Since at least the 7.x days, the highest the editions have > > always been X.0 through X.3 > > Why do you think either of us was sur

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-14 Thread Glenn Holmer
On Thursday 13 September 2007 19:44, Aaron Kulkis wrote: > Glenn Holmer wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 15:46, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >> * Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 16:35]: > >>> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 08:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > Announced yesterday, ther

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4

2007-09-13 Thread jdd
Felix Miata wrote: Maybe this time we can get rid of the point release silliness like Fedora did. Call it 11. Call the next 12, and the next 13 true. the .x should be reserved to minor fixes (like the second dvd set recently) jdd -- http://www.dodin.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4

2007-09-13 Thread Felix Miata
On 2007/09/13 20:44 (GMT-0400) Aaron Kulkis apparently typed: > Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, > Why do either of you find this surprising > Since at least the 7.x days, the highest the editions have > always been X.0 through X.3 Maybe this time we can get

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-13 Thread Aaron Kulkis
Glenn Holmer wrote: On Tuesday 11 September 2007 15:46, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 16:35]: On Tuesday 11 September 2007 08:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, perhaps related to inclu

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Glenn Holmer
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 15:46, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 16:35]: > > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 08:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, > > > perhaps related to inclusion/upgrade of/to KDE

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 16:35]: > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 08:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, perhaps > > related to inclusion/upgrade of/to KDE4. > > Have you got a link for that? Thanks. Date: Mon, 10 Sep 20

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Glenn Holmer
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 08:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, perhaps > related to inclusion/upgrade of/to KDE4. Have you got a link for that? Thanks. -- "After the vintage season came the aftermath - and Cenbe." Glenn Holmer (Q-Lin

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Kai Ponte
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 06:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 08:39]: > > Notice: beware of adding too many partitions! If you have more than 16 > > you will not be able to install suse 10.4 (yes, that's a four). > > Announced yesterday, there will be no

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Alexey Eremenko
On 9/11/07, Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The Tuesday 2007-09-11 at 09:19 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > * Carlos E. R. [09-11-07 08:39]: > > > Notice: beware of adding too many partitions! If you have more than 16 > > > you w

Re: [opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2007-09-11 at 09:19 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Carlos E. R. [09-11-07 08:39]: > > Notice: beware of adding too many partitions! If you have more than 16 > > you will not be able to install suse 10.4 (yes, that's a four). > > Ann

[opensuse] No openSUSE 10.4, was: Questions for Partitioning guru's - Solved

2007-09-11 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Carlos E. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 08:39]: > Notice: beware of adding too many partitions! If you have more than 16 > you will not be able to install suse 10.4 (yes, that's a four). Announced yesterday, there will be no 10.4. It will be 11.0, perhaps related to inclusion/upgrade of/to K