[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-09-06 22:03]: > > Lots of people think it stopped being SuSE when it became SUSE. > If you are shooting at Novell here, iirc, the change from SuSE to SUSE came before Novell purchased SUSE. -- Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Mark Hounschell
James Knott wrote: > John E. Perry wrote: >> Ken Jennings wrote: >>> ... But they only do that when they're too lazy to flip the switches by >>> hand on their Altairs. >>> >> Hey, I did that! Well the bootloader, at least -- on Digital PDP-8, >> PDP-11, HP 2100, hp21mx, General Automation SPC-16,

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Matt T.
On Friday 10 November 2006 07:49, Darryl Gregorash wrote: > On 08/11/06 21:11, Matt T. wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 November 2006 08:13, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >> Have you already made you mind up that SUSE is no more? And what > >> basis? > > > > 1) Experience with seeing Novell buying, hyping, ki

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Ed McCanless
On Thursday 09 November 2006 21:46, Ken Jennings wrote: > On Thursday 09 November 2006 21:25, James Knott wrote: > > Darryl Gregorash wrote: > > > On 09/11/06 06:59, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > I thought real programmers write code at the command line: in DOStalk, > > > copy con filename.exe > > > >

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: > Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) Does a VIC-20 count?? -- Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org@ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Carl William Spitzer IV
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 23:30 -0500, JJ Gitties wrote: > But it's not gonna happen. 10.1 is probably going to be my last SUSE > distro. I am going Ubuntu or Fedora. I would ever go with Red Hat at this > point. They seem the lesser of evils. > Forget Dead Rat try CentOS. I know someone who will

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Carl William Spitzer IV
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:19 -0500, Doug McGarrett wrote: > > > I love it! You guys should go on the Letterman show, or something. > But I must tell you that I kept a 4" diameter roll of paper tape, punched > on a model 35, for over 30 years, in my desk, thinking it might come > in handy someday.

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Ed McCanless
On Thursday 09 November 2006 20:46, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > My dictionary contains SuSE :-P > > -- > Cheers, >Carlos E. R. This is the way I've been writing it since someone corrected me back in August. -- -- ED -- - T

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread Geoffrey
Could we please take this totally off topic thread to private email please. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin

[opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-13 Thread Carl William Spitzer IV
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 06:55 -0500, James Knott wrote: > John E. Perry wrote: > > Ken Jennings wrote: > >> ... But they only do that when they're too lazy to flip the switches by > >> hand on their Altairs. > >> > > > > Hey, I did that! Well the bootloader, at least -- on Digital PDP-8, > > PDP-11

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Ken Jennings
On Friday 10 November 2006 15:42, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: > > Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) > > Does a VIC-20 count?? I suppose it can count up to $ff before using multi-byte math. -

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Doug McGarrett
At 03:42 PM 11/10/2006 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >Content-Disposition: inline > >* James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: >> Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) > >Does a VIC-20 count?? >-- >Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535 /snip/ I

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-10 Thread Ed McCanless
On Friday 10 November 2006 22:09, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote: > > > I owned a TRS80-4P up until I could afford to buy my first 486. I did > word processing on it. We still had Windows 3.1.1 and I think it was > DOS 6.0 on that DX2-66 with 4 meg. I think its guts are in a box here > some pla

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2006-11-10 at 22:38 -0500, Ed McCanless wrote: > Does everyone interested in computing save this kind of stuff? I'm criticized > for it all the time. I kept a TRS80, a TI99, and three 286's laying around > until I had to move, and was fo

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Ed McCanless
On Saturday 11 November 2006 06:40, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > I do... I have my Amstrad PC 512 in working order ;-) Now that's one I'm not familiar with. And, it's good to see that I got thru with the new address. -- -- ED -- - To

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread James Knott
Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: >> Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) > > Does a VIC-20 count?? I modified a couple of those, to increase memory from 5K to 8K (yes, that's right, 8 kilobytes!)

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 11:26 -0500, Ed McCanless wrote: > On Saturday 11 November 2006 06:40, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > > I do... I have my Amstrad PC 512 in working order ;-) > > Now that's one I'm not familiar with. And, it's good to see that

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Bob S
On Saturday 11 November 2006 13:29, Ed McCanless wrote: > On Thursday 09 November 2006 20:46, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > My dictionary contains SuSE :-P > > > > -- > > Cheers, > >Carlos E. R. > > This is the way I've been writing it since someone corrected me back > in August. Well.ha

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Kai Ponte
On Saturday 11 November 2006 16:02, Carlos E. R. wrote: > The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 11:26 -0500, Ed McCanless wrote: > > On Saturday 11 November 2006 06:40, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > I do... I have my Amstrad PC 512 in working order ;-) > > > > Now that's one I'm not familiar with. And, it's good

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-11 Thread Robert Smits
On Friday 10 November 2006 12:42, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: > > Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) > > Does a VIC-20 count?? Only to the extent that when I brought one back from Oregon to Canada, where they weren't available at the

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 19:36 -0800, Kai Ponte wrote: > > Mine had two disketes and 512 KB, CGA mono graphics. Later I added a 32MB > > HD on card, plus a termally regulated fan I designed myself. > > Buddy of mine in Stuttgart, Germany had one.

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread Carlos E. R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 20:05 -0800, Robert Smits wrote: > > Does a VIC-20 count?? > > Only to the extent that when I brought one back from Oregon to Canada, where > they weren't available at the time, I had it bungied to the back of my > motor

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread James Knott
Ed McCanless wrote: > On Friday 10 November 2006 22:09, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote: > >> I owned a TRS80-4P up until I could afford to buy my first 486. I did >> word processing on it. We still had Windows 3.1.1 and I think it was >> DOS 6.0 on that DX2-66 with 4 meg. I think its guts are in

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread James Knott
Carlos E. R. wrote: > > The Friday 2006-11-10 at 22:38 -0500, Ed McCanless wrote: > > > Does everyone interested in computing save this kind of stuff? I'm > criticized > > for it all the time. I kept a TRS80, a TI99, and three 286's laying > around > > until I had to move, and was forced to reduce

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread James Knott
Robert Smits wrote: > On Friday 10 November 2006 12:42, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >> * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: >> >>> Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) >>> >> Does a VIC-20 count?? >> > > Only to the extent that when I brought one back fro

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-12 Thread Doug McGarrett
At 07:43 AM 11/12/2006 -0500, James Knott wrote: > >Ed McCanless wrote: >> On Friday 10 November 2006 22:09, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote: >> >/snip/ >> Does everyone interested in computing save this kind of stuff? I'm criticized >> for it all the time. I kept a TRS80, a TI99, and three 286's l

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-13 Thread Carl William Spitzer IV
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 17:43 -0500, James Knott wrote: > Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-06 13:22]: > >> Also, CP/M was around before the Trash-80. ;-) > > > > Does a VIC-20 count?? > > I modified a couple of those, to increase memory from 5K to 8K (yes, > tha

Re: [opensuse] Re: [SLE] Red Hat's take:

2006-11-13 Thread James Knott
Carl William Spitzer IV wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 06:55 -0500, James Knott wrote: > >> Ah yes, the PDP-8 RIM loader. Brings back (core) memories. ;-) >> >> Incidentally, I still have a core memory plane (4 Kbits IIRC) from a >> Collins 8500B. >> > > The Smithsonian Museum is searchin