On Dec 20, 2007 3:53 PM, Eberhard Roloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> VMware Server Episode 2.0: The Revenge of the Web UI
> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4403
>
More than enough. Thanks.
--
Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny)
Even the most advanced equipment in the hands of the ignorant is just
a pile o
On Thursday 20 December 2007 23:23:57 Michael Kershaw wrote:
> Does that really have to be the case though? With XEN, your able to
> isolate physical pci slots to a virtual machine.
I don't think xen supports that for graphics cards (yet)
Anders
--
Madness takes its toll
--
To unsubscribe, e-
On Dec 20, 2007 10:27 AM, Eberhard Roloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Freemyer wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi !
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a tough choice. Client have an Intel-based Quad-Core PC with SuSE
> >> 10.3,
> >> an
Sunny wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 9:27 AM, Eberhard Roloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> However, as VMware Server will move away from being a desktop
>> virtualization substitution to vmware workstation with the upcoming
>> version 2, I would suggest to use virtualbox, instead.
>
> Can you provide s
Ken Schneider wrote:
jdd pecked at the keyboard and wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
This raises a question for me. One significant down-side with VMware
(hardly a show-stopper, but clearly sub-optimal) is the need to
rebuild its kernel modules every time you upgrade your Linux kernel.
Is the s
On Dec 20, 2007 9:27 AM, Eberhard Roloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, as VMware Server will move away from being a desktop
> virtualization substitution to vmware workstation with the upcoming
> version 2, I would suggest to use virtualbox, instead.
Can you provide some more information
On Thursday 20 December 2007 09:02, Ken Schneider wrote:
> jdd pecked at the keyboard and wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >> This raises a question for me. One significant down-side with
> >> VMware (hardly a show-stopper, but clearly sub-optimal) is the
> >> need to rebuild its kernel modules
jdd pecked at the keyboard and wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
>> This raises a question for me. One significant down-side with VMware
>> (hardly a show-stopper, but clearly sub-optimal) is the need to
>> rebuild its kernel modules every time you upgrade your Linux kernel.
>>
>> Is the same tru
Randall R Schulz wrote:
This raises a question for me. One significant down-side with VMware
(hardly a show-stopper, but clearly sub-optimal) is the need to rebuild
its kernel modules every time you upgrade your Linux kernel.
Is the same true for VirtualBox?
AFAIK Yes
(and usb is not avail
On Thursday 20 December 2007 07:27, Eberhard Roloff wrote:
> ...
>
> However, as VMware Server will move away from being a desktop
> virtualization substitution to vmware workstation with the upcoming
> version 2, I would suggest to use VirtualBox, instead.
This raises a question for me. One signi
Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 5:25 PM, Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>>
>> I have a tough choice. Client have an Intel-based Quad-Core PC with SuSE
>> 10.3,
>> and time to time (~1 - 1.5 hours day) needs Win XP with Adobe Photoshop,
>> InDesign, Dre
11 matches
Mail list logo
