Edward Dunagin wrote:
i know that i'm old and have a fading memory, but what
is dejanews feature?
you are not old enough :-)
long time ago dejanews stored all the news groups traffic
and had a personal profile, able to display all the posts
of a given person. dejanews was taken by
Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 07:04 schrieb houghi:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:20:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've mentioned in my first posting I would like to have some kind of
report that wiill help novice users/subscribers to find their way.
Information about the most active
the best way to rate a thread (and not a people) is to
summarize the usefull content on a wiki page (or a SDB wiki
page).
Many people makes a great job in the background, others
(like me :-() are easy at writing but not at coding and are
more visible but not better for that.
jdd
--
Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 07:04 schrieb houghi:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:20:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've mentioned in my first posting I would like to have some kind of
report that wiill help novice users/subscribers to find their way.
Information about the most active
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:31:48AM +0100, jdd wrote:
long time ago dejanews stored all the news groups traffic
and had a personal profile, able to display all the posts
of a given person. dejanews was taken by google, I don't
know if this feature is still there.
As Dejanews.com has been
Hi David
Am Mon, 13. February 2006 18:23 schrieb David Haller:
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, houghi wrote:
Do you have a link to a posting and how it looks?
http://lists.suse.com/archives/suse-linux/2003-Aug/0402.html
Note that my site is temporarily unavailable.
It would be interested
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of quality is
the fact that (not only just in this example) it shows the posters I would
rate amongst the best in quality. :-)
The measurement of quality you have (quoting, ratio of added content)
isn't
Am Mon, 13. February 2006 22:59 schrieb Anders Johansson:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of quality
is the fact that (not only just in this example) it shows the posters I
would rate amongst the best in quality. :-)
The measurement
hi folks, i have been a lurker, but...
On 2/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mon, 13. February 2006 22:59 schrieb Anders Johansson:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of
quality
is the fact that (not only just in
Edward Dunagin wrote:
i have noticed that one of the neat things about 'slashdot' is the means
of looking at a user from selection and seeing what that user has written
about and a way to look at that message. i find this very informative.
you remind me of some old dejanews feature :-)
jdd
On 2/13/06, jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Dunagin wrote:
i have noticed that one of the neat things about 'slashdot' is the means
of looking at a user from selection and seeing what that user has
written
about and a way to look at that message. i find this very informative.
you
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[.]
What stands against the argument that your stats are no proof of quality is
the fact that (not only just in this example) it shows the posters I would
rate amongst the best in quality. :-)
Well, yes, there is a correlation that those who
* Edward Dunagin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-13-06 17:59]:
i know that i'm old and have a fading memory, but what
is dejanews feature?
It was an old means of sarching for postings: by an individual, of a
particular topic, in a particular newsgroup, from a particular
location, etc...
You must
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:27:24PM -0700, Edward Dunagin wrote:
i have noticed that one of the neat things about 'slashdot' is the means
of looking at a user from selection and seeing what that user has written
about and a way to look at that message. i find this very informative.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:20:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I've mentioned in my first posting I would like to have some kind of
report
that wiill help novice users/subscribers to find their way. Information about
the most active writers is one of this, a rating might also be
* houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-14-06 01:01]:
Bozeman, MT 59718
Nice to have an adress. As this is an international list, it might be
interesting to have a country as well. ;-)
Bozeman, Montana, would be in the USA
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
16 matches
Mail list logo
