On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:50, Robert Lewis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Very sad. Maybe now we know more about why Reiser
> isn't been developing further the filesystem and why SUSE
> was wise to switch back to ext3.
> Hans Reiser
>
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> Jump
Peter Nikolic wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:50, Robert Lewis wrote:
.
What is with all this darn HTML formatted crap hey people this is NOT
WINDBLOWS cut the HTML scribble and get back tp proper PLAINT text
emails Shee ..
What I don
On Friday 10 November 2006 23:02, Basil Chupin wrote:
> So what's happened since "we" got migrated?
I'm guessing Henne hasn't had time to figure all the
new stuff out while migrating all the lists.
As I understand it, its new hardware, and a different
list server. He's a busy guy.
Plus having
John Andersen wrote:
On Friday 10 November 2006 23:02, Basil Chupin wrote:
So what's happened since "we" got migrated?
I'm guessing Henne hasn't had time to figure all the
new stuff out while migrating all the lists.
As I understand it, its new hardware, and a different
list server. He's
On 2006-11-11 01:46, Peter Nikolic wrote:
>
>
> What is with all this darn HTML formatted crap hey people this is NOT
> WINDBLOWS cut the HTML scribble and get back tp proper PLAINT text
> emails Shee ..
Your reply reminds me of all the times I have scrolled th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2006-11-10 at 20:50 -0800, Robert Lewis wrote:
> Very sad. Maybe now we know more about why Reiser
> isn't been developing further the filesystem and why SUSE
> was wise to switch back to ext3.
|> [html plus two images ]
All that is ol
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 23:14 -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> On Friday 10 November 2006 23:02, Basil Chupin wrote:
> > So what's happened since "we" got migrated?
>
> I'm guessing Henne hasn't had time to figure all the
> new stuff out while migrating all the lists.
>
> As I understand it, its new
On 11/13/06, Carl William Spitzer IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW why would Suse drop Reiser just because the inventor is in jail.
Can't development continue without him?
from what I understand the community was very small, and very tightly
controlled by his fanatical approach and demands.
On 11/11/06, Peter Nikolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is with all this darn HTML formatted crap hey people this is NOT
WINDBLOWS cut the HTML scribble and get back tp proper PLAINT text
emails Shee ..
and how about trimming the crap from replies before you
On Monday 13 November 2006 10:19, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
>
> BTW why would Suse drop Reiser just because the inventor is in jail.
> Can't development continue without him?
When it was announced, there were other reasons given, and that
was before he was in jail.
There was a huge long th
Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 23:14 -0900, John Andersen wrote:
>
>> On Friday 10 November 2006 23:02, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>
>>> So what's happened since "we" got migrated?
>>>
>> I'm guessing Henne hasn't had time to figure all the
>> new stuff out while
On Monday 13 November 2006 20:09, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 11/11/06, Peter Nikolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > What is with all this darn HTML formatted crap hey people this is NOT
> > WINDBLOWS cut the HTML scribble and get back tp proper PLAINT text
> > emails Sh
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:19:04AM -0800, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 23:14 -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> > On Friday 10 November 2006 23:02, Basil Chupin wrote:
> > > So what's happened since "we" got migrated?
> >
> > I'm guessing Henne hasn't had time to figure all t
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:37:23AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> As I understand it reiser-3 was abandoned by Hans in so he could work on
> reiser-4 only. For him, there was no return. All bug fixes would only be
> applied
> to reiser-4. The kernel people completely rejected the way reiser-4 was
John Andersen wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:37, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> Reiser-3 will most likely be removed at
>> some time because no one is maintaining the code.
>
> Does it need a lot of maintenance? Lots of bugs stacking up?
>
There have been bug fixes to reiser-3 that only we
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:23:05 +0100
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We only changed the installer _default_. You can of course
> still select it in the istnaller.
So far, so good.
Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
that have been installed with ReiserFs?
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:37, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> Reiser-3 will most likely be removed at
> some time because no one is maintaining the code.
Does it need a lot of maintenance? Lots of bugs stacking up?
Its too bad, because it sure had a lot of promise, and considering he
wrote most o
As I understand it reiser-3 was abandoned by Hans in so he could work on
reiser-4 only. For him, there was no return. All bug fixes would only be applied
to reiser-4. The kernel people completely rejected the way reiser-4 was done and
Hans was not going to change it to conform to what the kernel pe
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:02, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> Also, when a kernel change happens that
> requires a change to the reiser code as well, who is going to make that
> change?
I think you misunderstand the benefits of having your module in the mainline
tree: you don't have to do all the w
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:25:00 +0100
Anders Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> > that have been installed with ReiserFs?
> > I did it with one and it was not precisely straightforward
> > Just a simple HowTo would be helpf
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 10:51, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> So far, so good.
> Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> that have been installed with ReiserFs?
> I did it with one and it was not precisely straightforward
> Just a simple HowTo would be helpfull enough
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 09:51, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> that have been installed with ReiserFs?
> I did it with one and it was not precisely straightforward
> Just a simple HowTo would be helpfull enough.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Anders Johansson wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:02, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> Also, when a kernel change happens that
>> requires a change to the reiser code as well, who is going to make that
>> change?
>
> I think you misunderstand the benefits of having your module in the mainline
> t
Anders Johansson a écrit :
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 10:51, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
So far, so good.
Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
that have been installed with ReiserFs?
I did it with one and it was not precisely straightforward
Just a simple HowTo woul
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:17:17 +
Matthew Stringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> > that have been installed with ReiserFs?
>
>
> Why would you want to do that? Just because 10.2 uses EXT3 as the default FS
> doesn't mean your
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 03:50, John Andersen wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 November 2006 00:37, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> > Reiser-3 will most likely be removed at
> > some time because no one is maintaining the code.
>
> Does it need a lot of maintenance? Lots of bugs stacking up?
>
> Its too bad,
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:40, jdd wrote:
> better wait any hardware change and use ext3 on new
> formatted partition.
>
> for now there no instruction from openSUSE/Novell to make a
> switch, so we can hope a very long maintenance cycle
>
> jdd
Exactly: IINBDFI. If its Not Broke, Don't Fix i
John Andersen wrote:
> [...]
>
> New installs should go to ext3, but there is no reason
> to change anything.
Well, I think there are better FS available than ext3. It might be a
good 'conservative' choice though.
CU, Th.
-
To
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> Well, if hou have a bunch of machines that you maintain and you add
> a new one once every couple of months, you may wish (just wish :) to
> deal with the same kind of root filesystem on every computer.
Well, I asume the root file
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:53, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
> John Andersen wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > New installs should go to ext3, but there is no reason
> > to change anything.
>
> Well, I think there are better FS available than ext3. It might be a
> good 'conservative' choice though.
>
What wou
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 11:55, Kai Ponte wrote:
> What would the better choice(s) be? I've been running Reiser since
> installing 9.1, and don't really know anything different.
>
> I've read about EXT2/3 and JFS and XFS, but don't know which would be
> better or worse than what I've got now run
Kai Ponte wrote:
> [...]
>
> What would the better choice(s) be? I've been running Reiser since installing
> 9.1, and don't really know anything different.
>
> I've read about EXT2/3 and JFS and XFS, but don't know which would be better
> or worse than what I've got now running on my general
On 2006-11-14 04:37, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
>
> Ext3 is not loaded in the kernel at boot time.
Then edit INITRD_MODULES in /etc/sysconfig/kernel/ and run mkinitrd.
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 14:11 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 11/13/06, Carl William Spitzer IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW why would Suse drop Reiser just because the inventor is in jail.
> > Can't development continue without him?
>
> from what I understand the community was very s
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 04:51, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> that have been installed with ReiserFs?
Here is how I made the switch:
1. Backup data
2. mkfs.ext3
3. Restore data
Bryan
***
Power
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 23:04, Bryan S. Tyson wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 November 2006 04:51, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> > Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> > that have been installed with ReiserFs?
>
> Here is how I made the switch:
>
> 1. Backup data
> 2. mkfs.ext
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:04:11 -0500
"Bryan S. Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> > that have been installed with ReiserFs?
>
> Here is how I made the switch:
>
> 1. Backup data
> 2. mkfs.ext3
> 3. Restore data
You're lucky.
M
Luciano Mannucci a écrit :
My mileage has been a bit longer:
mine is even different :-)
I noticed that most of the time I accumulate libraries from
tested software and my disk grow... making a full backup is
extremely long and I have no support big enough to make it
really reliable (last t
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 14:55 +0100, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:04:11 -0500
> "Bryan S. Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Would'nt it be nice to have a path to switch to ext3 the machines
> > > that have been installed with ReiserFs?
> >
> > Here is how I made the swit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2006-11-15 at 17:54 -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
> This has me curious about one thing. Would it not be possible to
> create the required root partition and rsync the data back onto it, from
> a removable media or mounted .iso image?
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 01:47 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> The Wednesday 2006-11-15 at 17:54 -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
>
> > This has me curious about one thing. Would it not be possible to
> > create the required root partition and rsync
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Thursday 2006-11-16 at 18:55 -0500, Mike McMullin wrote:
> > > This has me curious about one thing. Would it not be possible to
> > > create the required root partition and rsync the data back onto it, from
> > > a removable media or mounted .
42 matches
Mail list logo
