On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 10:48:44AM +0100, houghi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:46:54PM +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > Who am I to tell SUSE that _not_ building a packages X with
> > a capability Y is a bug? I'm just the messenger here.
>
> You are a user. Worst case cenario: Bug is clos
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:46:54PM +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> Who am I to tell SUSE that _not_ building a packages X with
> a capability Y is a bug? I'm just the messenger here.
You are a user. Worst case cenario: Bug is closed because they do not
think it is a bug. As long as you do not sw
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 11:04:44PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Well, 5 CDs with 650 MB each can't hold as much software as a dual
> layer DVD with 8500 MB. So some of the packages are only on DVD.
> YaST and pin didn't show you these packages because you can't install
> them from the CDs
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
> Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > I'v installed from CDs btw, no DVD player on that machine, but I
> > would presume that ARCHIVES.gz I copied from CD1 should list all the
> > packages.
>
> It lists all packages (and their contents - if you're just looking for a
> parti
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
> Theo v. Werkhoven schrieb:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
[..]
> >>So it *is* on the SUSE Linux 10.0 DVD.
> >
> > So it seems. Thanks for enlighting me.
> > But then I wonder why pin or a search in yast didn't reveal this.
> > I'v installed from CDs btw, no DVD
Theo v. Werkhoven schrieb:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
>
>>Theo v. Werkhoven schrieb:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 you said:
>>>
>>>
It's on the server:
opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/suse/i586/postfix-mysql-2.2.5-5.i586.rpm
>>>
>>>Thus *not* part of SUSE10.0, and my additi
Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> I'v installed from CDs btw, no DVD player on that machine, but I
> would presume that ARCHIVES.gz I copied from CD1 should list all the
> packages.
It lists all packages (and their contents - if you're just looking for a
particular package name INDEX.gz is much easier to
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
> Theo v. Werkhoven schrieb:
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 you said:
> >
> >>It's on the server:
> >>opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/suse/i586/postfix-mysql-2.2.5-5.i586.rpm
> >
> > Thus *not* part of SUSE10.0, and my additions to the wishlist were
> > corre
Theo v. Werkhoven schrieb:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 you said:
>
>>It's on the server:
>>opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/suse/i586/postfix-mysql-2.2.5-5.i586.rpm
>
> Thus *not* part of SUSE10.0, and my additions to the wishlist were
> correct to begin with.
zgrep postfix-mysql /media/s
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 you said:
> Op woensdag 15 februari 2006 23:25, schreef Theo v. Werkhoven:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 you said:
> > > I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > * postfix with mysql support: Part of 10.0 already AFAIK
> > > (postfix-mysql)
> >
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 you said:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 you said:
> >
> > > I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
> > [..]
> > > * postfix with mysql support: Part of 10.0 already AFAIK
> > > (postfix-mysql)
> >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 you said:
>
> > I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
> [..]
> > * postfix with mysql support: Part of 10.0 already AFAIK
> > (postfix-mysql)
>
> Can't find this anywhere, not in Yast, or w
Op woensdag 15 februari 2006 23:25, schreef Theo v. Werkhoven:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 you said:
> > I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
>
> [..]
>
> > * postfix with mysql support: Part of 10.0 already AFAIK
> > (postfix-mysql)
>
> Can't find this anywhere, not in Yast, or with
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 you said:
> I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
[..]
> * postfix with mysql support: Part of 10.0 already AFAIK
> (postfix-mysql)
Can't find this anywhere, not in Yast, or with pin.
Also vsftpd you commented on is *not* built with SSL (see my own
comment).
"Alexander S. Usov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 11 February 2006 16:05, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:13:37AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> >> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > I am just looking around on openSU
On Saturday 11 February 2006 16:05, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:13:37AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
> >> > http://en.opensuse.org/Pa
On Saturday 11 February 2006 09:05, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
> * NetBeans 5.0 is now in FACTORY
Wonderful news!
--
==
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Jens Siebert wrote:
> ...
>>> I added two things to the eyecandy section of the wishlist (QTCurve and
>>> KBFX). Maybe these are some things to think about.
>
> http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/rpm-navigation.php?cat=Themes/qtcurve
> http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-gu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Siebert wrote:
...
> I added two things to the eyecandy section of the wishlist (QTCurve and
> KBFX). Maybe these are some things to think about.
http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/rpm-navigation.php?cat=Themes/qtcurve
http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/m
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2006-02-11 16:05:36 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > * RubyGems: Is now in FACTORY
>
> was already part of 10.0 iirc.
Indeed:
---> ./CD1/suse/i586/rubygems-0.8.11-5.i586.rpm
---> ./CD1/suse/ppc/rubygems-0.8.11-5.ppc.rpm
---> ./
On 2006-02-11 16:05:36 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> * RubyGems: Is now in FACTORY
was already part of 10.0 iirc.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:13:37AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Wishlist and I see almost no
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:05:36PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I just went over the list and commented a few entries:
Thanks.
> What puzzled me were a number of users asking for features that we
> already have in 10.0 ;-)
I have not checked them all. (Well, I have not checked any of them) It
houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:13:37AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
>> > http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Wishlist and I see almost no change in
>> > things that h
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:13:37AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
> > http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Wishlist and I see almost no change in
> > things that have been requested months ago.
> >
> > Is a
houghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
> http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Wishlist and I see almost no change in
> things that have been requested months ago.
>
> Is anybody looking at these pages and more importantly, is anybody taking
> action
I am just looking around on openSUSE.org and came across
http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Wishlist and I see almost no change in
things that have been requested months ago.
Is anybody looking at these pages and more importantly, is anybody taking
action around these pages?
houghi
--
Taxes, n.:
27 matches
Mail list logo
