On Tuesday 20 March 2007 13:36, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
> It more than likely is not a problem with the update system as much as a
> problem with your update source. I'll bet if you check your source with
> a browser you will find the same, it has not been updated. Sad but too
> often true thes
On Tuesday 20 March 2007, Michael Nelson wrote:
> I hope they salt the earth wherever it was conceived, so nothing will ever
> grow there again.
No, the last I checked those Gnome heads were still employed
by Novell.
Their one time to shine. They blew it big time.
--
__
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:38:24PM +, Benji Weber wrote:
> Indeed, if you uninstall ZMD (and those which depend on it,
> zen-updater, rug etc) you will have opensuse-updater instead, which
> works fine. ZMD will not be installed by default on 10.3 (It is
> already removed in the alphas).
I ho
On 3/20/07, kanenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that not true? If it is, we might as well take the new update system out and
put it out of it's misery, if it isn't, why don't we take it out any way and
shoot it, it *stilll* is totally incapable. Yes, it had me fooled for over
2.5 months, alas it
kanenas wrote:
> Don't know where to find server stack traces on my computer, but the
> blue/white globe has not turned orange in about a month in my x86-64
> partition.
It more than likely is not a problem with the update system as much as a
problem with your update source. I'll bet if you ch
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 05:08, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's this (10.2, x86-64):
>
> System.NullReferenceException: A null value was found where an object
> instance was required.
>
> Server stack trace:
> at Novell.Zenworks.Zmd.Packaging.PackageManager.GetUpdates
> (Novell.Zenworks.Zm
Hi,
What's this (10.2, x86-64):
System.NullReferenceException: A null value was found where an object
instance was required.
Server stack trace:
at Novell.Zenworks.Zmd.Packaging.PackageManager.GetUpdates
(Novell.Zenworks.Zmd.Catalog catalog) [0x0]
at Novell.Zenworks.Zmd.Packaging.Packa
