To all those interested,
ARM have finally published the reference manual for ARMv8 \o/ You can grab a
copy [0] now, you will need to accept the EULA first.
Regards,
Andy
0 -
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0487a/index.html
--
Andrew Wafaa - Principal Engineer
rts=1
both Firefox and Thunderbird need builders with 4GB RAM (even if it's
a swapfile). Are you able to assign them to one?
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andrew Wafaa
IRC: FunkyPenguin
GPG: 0x3A36312F
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
/openSUSE/glibc-2.18-4.6.1.armv7hl.rpm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure it will fix the problem because build log seems to tell
>>>>>>>> multiarch was auto-detected before. But let's try it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If rpm, yast or zypper cannot install it, extract it on the SD card.
>>>>>>> hmmm, tried it, didn't helped, tried 12.3 glibc, that one helped :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will ask upstream.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But could you try a 13.1 JeOS rootfs, please? Just to be sure that
>>>>>> things are not working with updated glibc and software built with this
>>>>>> one.
>>>>> Upstream seems to know this problem. See this resolved bug:
>>>>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15905
>>>>>
>>>>> Will try to apply this patch on a locally built glibc and I will send you
>>>>> so that you can test.
>>>>>
>>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>>
>>> Could you try this one, please:
>>> http://guillaume.gardet.free.fr/openSUSE/glibc-2.18-312.1.armv7hl.rpm
>>>
>> This one works! Great! Thanks!
>>
>
> Ok, perfect!
> I submitted my glibc patch to Base:System project, see:
> https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/208445
>
> Dirk, Alex, what would be the best way to handle this update? copypac to
> 13.1:Ports, 13.1:Update or something else?
>
>
I forget exactly how, but you should be able to submit it to
13.1:Update as an update (which this is). It then goes through review
and then gets pushed out.
--
Andrew Wafaa
IRC: FunkyPenguin
GPG: 0x3A36312F
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
On 12 December 2013 13:52, David Byte wrote:
> Item Type: Task
> Start Date: Thursday, 12 Dec 2013
> Due: Thursday, 12 Dec 2013
>
> Anyone have thoughts on these devices?
> cubox-i.com
>
These are supposedly good devices, although I don't believe we have
any i.MX6 support in openSUSE yet. Speak
On 19 December 2013 13:36, Bob wrote:
> I hope that this mailing list is appropriate for my question. If not,
> I apologize for the bother.
>
No need to apologise, this is indeed the correct place to ask your question ;-)
> I have successfully installed openSUSE 12.3 on my Samsung Series 3 ARM
>
On 27 January 2014 12:57, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's this time of year again... It seems there is no openSUSE talk this
> year and no bus from NUE, but a stand. Who of you will be attending, and
> are there any plans for some ARM demo?
>
I'll be there, but I'm not sure how much time I'll
Hi,
If possible could you apply the attached patch to both Factory and 13.1 kernels?
Many thanks,
Andy
0001-Enable-XENFS-on-ARMv7-and-ARMv8.patch
Description: Binary data
On 5 February 2014 15:36, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If possible could you apply the attached patch to both Factory and 13.1
> kernels?
>
> Many thanks,
> Andy
Please find attached a reworked version of the patch. This is required
to run Xen on ARM.
If possible, ple
I know I've been grumbling about this for at least today on IRC, but
I'm aware that not everyone is on IRC. At present I'm trying to reboot
my Arndale board using the Factory image, and failing :(
Firstly, neither shutdown, reboot or init 0, init 6 commands work.
Secondly, if I do a hard poweroff
Hi,
I'm hoping to create a new image for testing on the OMAP5 powered uEVM
board. I've successfully built the kernel and dtb packages (using
3.14-rc3) and would now like to get it all into a usable package. I
was thinking of creating a new image called OMAP5 to prevent any
confusion. I've got a co
Hi,
I'm currently trying to bring up a uEVM board, and have what I believe
all the correct components for it [0]. Regardless of having a dtb
package and using kernel 3.14-rc2 it still fails to boot, with u-boot
complaining. Below is my boot log, does anyone have ideas/tips to
resolve this?
On 27-02-2014 09:34, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to bring up a uEVM board, and have what I
believe all the correct components for it [0]. Regardless of having a
dtb package and using kernel 3.14-rc2 it still fails to boot, with
u-boot complaining. Below is my boot log,
Hi Guillaume,
On 27-02-2014 12:46, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
Le 27/02/2014 10:50, Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
On 27-02-2014 09:34, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to bring up a uEVM board, and have what I
believe all the correct components for it [0]. Regardless of having
On 27-02-2014 15:02, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
- Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
Hi Guillaume,
On 27-02-2014 12:46, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 27/02/2014 10:50, Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
>> On 27-02-2014 09:34, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>&
On 27-02-2014 15:16, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
Output from print command:
# print
arch=arm
baudrate=115200
board=omap5_uevm
board_name=omap5_uevm
bootcmd=run findfdt; run mmcboot;setenv mmcdev 1; setenv bootpart 1:2;
setenv mmcroot /dev/mmcblk0p2 rw; run mmcboot;
bootdelay=1
bootdir=/boot
On 27-02-2014 17:40, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
- Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
On 27-02-2014 15:16, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
>>
>> Output from print command:
>> # print
>> arch=arm
>> baudrate=115200
>> board=omap5_uevm
>> board_name=omap
On 28 February 2014 10:37, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
>
> Le 27/02/2014 18:43, Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
>> On 27-02-2014 17:40, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
>>> - Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
>>>> On 27-02-2014 15:16, guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
>>
On 10 March 2014 14:17, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
>
> Le 10/03/2014 12:34, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will update and re-enable the ARM kernel configs for Factory but I would
>> like to confirm that LPAE is / should be a -default kernel, with LPAE
>> support and KVM enabled.
>>
>> A
On 23 September 2014 08:07, Matwey V. Kornilov
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we need ARM support for http://software.opensuse.org
> At least for couple best-supported boards.
>
I agree, but this introduces a couple of issues:
1) which boards?
Do we have a definitive list of platforms supported by the
Ladies and germs,
The release of 13.2 is imminent and it has come to be that in the
current draft of the release announcement there is no mention of ARM
:-(
Is there any chance we could rustle up a paragraph or two of the key
ARM related features for inclusion in the announcement? Things I can
th
When trying to get openSUSE working on the Thunder simulator the below
issues have arisen, I was wondering if it would be possible to get
feedback on the suggested fixes:
The kernel needs to be comiled with "CONFIG_FHANDLE=y".
Issues: During init process observed below failure message continuousl
On 31 October 2014 03:07, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 30.10.2014 um 21:32 schrieb Andrew Wafaa :
>>
>> When trying to get openSUSE working on the Thunder simulator the below
>> issues have arisen, I was wondering if it would be possible to get
>> fee
On 31 October 2014 03:28, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Am 30.10.2014 um 21:32 schrieb Andrew Wafaa:
>> When trying to get openSUSE working on the Thunder simulator the below
>> issues have arisen, I was wondering if it would be possible to get
>> feed
Hi,
Looking at the current failures/unresolvables for AArch64, I notice
that a large chink of these are language frameworks that are known not
to have been ported yet to the architecture. In the interest of seeing
the wood for the trees, is it worth disabling those known not to work?
Ones I'm thi
Hi,
On 8 September 2014 at 11:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 08.09.14 10:00, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 08/09/2014 09:07, Matwey V. Kornilov a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What do you think about adding couple of test cases for ARM to our
>>> openQA? I remember two cases when our JeOS
Hi Dirk,
On 5 January 2015 at 15:32, Dirk Müller wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> Does anyone know if this patch is still required, and what else needs
>> to be done to get OpenQA to work? I'm being shamed by our illustrious
>> Chairman with regards to OpenQA and as a matter of pride I'd like to
>> get O
On 5 January 2015 at 15:31, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 05.01.15 16:06, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 8 September 2014 at 11:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08.09.14 10:00, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
>>>> Hi,
&g
On 6 January 2015 at 11:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 06.01.15 11:23, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
>> Am 05.01.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Andrew Wafaa:
>>> On 5 January 2015 at 15:32, Dirk Müller wrote:
>>>>> Does anyone know if this patch is still required, and
Does anyone know if we havea package for UIM - User Mode Init Manager
for TI shared transport? I've looked on OBS and can't see one, but I
may be missing something. This is needed for the Hikey from 96Boards.
Linaro have a couple of patches and have also added a systemd service
file and udev rule
On 16 February 2015 at 16:57, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andrew Wafaa writes:
>
>> Does anyone know if we havea package for UIM - User Mode Init Manager
>> for TI shared transport? I've looked on OBS and can't see one, but I
>> may be missing something. This is
On 16 February 2015 at 17:09, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> On 16 February 2015 at 16:57, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Andrew Wafaa writes:
>>
>>> Does anyone know if we havea package for UIM - User Mode Init Manager
>>> for TI shared transport? I've looked on O
On 16 February 2015 at 20:34, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 16.02.15 18:12, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
>> On 16 February 2015 at 17:09, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
>>> On 16 February 2015 at 16:57, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>> Andrew Wafaa writes:
>>>>
&g
Hi,
Could someone confirm that it is OK to forward our aarch64 config to
Linaro for them to integrate into the kernelci loop? Currently
kernelci.org only tests defconfigs which are rather minimal.
Also can someone confirm what the stance is on page sizes? Will
openSUSE support both 4K and 64K pag
Aloha,
What are the steps needed to build an EFI based image? Take into
account that the target board is not yet included in upstream
tianocore but is in a downstream repo.
Thanks,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow
On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Dirk Müller schrieb:
>>
>> for a couple of weeks we've been experimenting with native builds for
>> aarch64, and are now happy to announce that we consider the current
>> state stable enough to announce it as being available.
>
>
> Thanks to that a
Hi,
I'm the proud owner of a delightful Asus C100P Chromebook Flip
(veyron_minnie), and I'm hoping to create an image similar to the
Series3 Samsung Chromebook. One of the big differences is that the
Flip uses coreboot only and not u-boot, so I can't reasonably just
copy what was done previously.
Hi,
I'm running Tumbleweed on my Chromebook and generally most things
work. However a key item for me is LibreOffice, and unfortunately that
fails after the splash screen pops up. When I run it from a terminal I
get the following error:
~> libreoffice
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: err
On 29 February 2016 at 15:19, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that there is a new raspberry pi.
> See: https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-3-on-sale/
>
> It is a quad-core Cortex A53 (64-bit).
>
> Probably not EFI compatible.
>
Not only will it most likely not be EFI co
On 29 February 2016 at 15:33, Dirk Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> The advantage of this version over previous is an increase in
>> performance and also integrated ethernet/wifi/bluetooth.
>
> Yeah, the wifi thing is a big thing for me, I immediately ordered one.
>
> I created a test image for the Rpi3 h
On 15 September 2016 at 13:47, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hello fellow openSUSE ARM developers,
>
> As you might have realized, we haven’t published openSUSE Tumbleweed in quite
> some time. The biggest reason for that (among minor hickups) is that we’re
> using btrfs on 64k PAGE_SIZE, which starte
Hi,
Could someone remind me what steps are needed to get a native openSUSE
kernel up on chromebooks and as such enable creating a full
installable image (similar to what was done to the original Samsung
Chromebook).
I'd like to create an image for the Samsung Plus (aarch64), and as it
uses 4.4 I
On 11 December 2017 at 20:23, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Am 11.12.2017 um 14:22 schrieb Alex Naumov:
>> do we want to integrate everything what Pinebook needs to our TW
>> images OR we would like to have separate images for it?
>
> I don't think it's possible to combine the Pinebook into
42 matches
Mail list logo
