On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.03.2015 um 13:28 schrieb Richard Biener:
> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It seems I am running into
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
> >> compiling mm/migrate.c from linux-next.git (exy
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Dirk Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Apparently that is not built for armv7l though.
> > Fixed.
>
> I’m not sure I *want* it to run against armv7l all the time though, since the
> gccX-testsuite packages are a significant resource drain (if they build at
> all due to the const
Hi,
>> Apparently that is not built for armv7l though.
> Fixed.
I’m not sure I *want* it to run against armv7l all the time though, since the
gccX-testsuite packages are a significant resource drain (if they build at all
due to the constraints).
Seems like we should be putting that one out as
Am 31.03.2015 um 13:28 schrieb Richard Biener:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems I am running into
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
>> compiling mm/migrate.c from linux-next.git (exynos_defconfig-derived
>> config) natively on armv7hl:
>>
>>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems I am running into
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
> compiling mm/migrate.c from linux-next.git (exynos_defconfig-derived
> config) natively on armv7hl:
>
> gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.3 20140627 [gcc-4_8-branch revision