Hi Adrian,
Apart from the constraints issues, we do have currently 1200 build jobs
open for 16 armv7l workers. I pushed the priority for this particular
project temporarly now, but IMHO we should re-consider the qemu build
approach. The arm workers will not be able to handle it.
Looking at
Le 18/12/2013 17:13, Adrian Schröter a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, 17:09:40 wrote Guillaume Gardet:
Le 18/12/2013 16:56, Adrian Schröter a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, 16:52:10 wrote Guillaume Gardet:
Le 16/12/2013 14:10, Michal Marek a écrit :
On 16.12.2013 10:52,
On Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2013, 14:09:22 wrote Guillaume Gardet:
Le 18/12/2013 17:13, Adrian Schröter a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, 17:09:40 wrote Guillaume Gardet:
Le 18/12/2013 16:56, Adrian Schröter a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, 16:52:10 wrote Guillaume
Le 16/12/2013 14:10, Michal Marek a écrit :
On 16.12.2013 10:52, Adrian Schröter wrote:
JFYI, after checking the needed sizes of the builds for the architectures,
I set this now
%ifarch armv7l
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 7
%else
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 14
Le 18/12/2013 16:56, Adrian Schröter a écrit :
On Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2013, 16:52:10 wrote Guillaume Gardet:
Le 16/12/2013 14:10, Michal Marek a écrit :
On 16.12.2013 10:52, Adrian Schröter wrote:
JFYI, after checking the needed sizes of the builds for the architectures,
I set this now
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
I would copy the kernel into the Ports repo straight away, but it's very
complicated to do. You need to somehow copy the package, create all the
links, configure some metadata to keep version numbers in sync between the
individual packages so that the
On Freitag, 13. Dezember 2013, 16:12:54 wrote Alexander Graf:
On 13.12.2013, at 15:50, Guillaume Gardet guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
Le 13/12/2013 15:40, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 13/12/2013 15:13, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 13.12.2013, at 12:33, Guillaume Gardet
JFYI, after checking the needed sizes of the builds for the architectures,
I set this now
%ifarch armv7l
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 7
%else
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 14
Constraint: hardware:processors 8
%endif
It does not make sense to ignore the size entirely, because we
On 16.12.2013 10:52, Adrian Schröter wrote:
JFYI, after checking the needed sizes of the builds for the architectures,
I set this now
%ifarch armv7l
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 7
%else
Constraint: hardware:disk:size unit=G 14
Constraint: hardware:processors 8
%endif
Thanks
Le 13/12/2013 15:13, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 13.12.2013, at 12:33, Guillaume Gardet guillaume.gar...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Dirk,
Hi Alex,
My patches are accepted in openSUSE GIT kernel repo so, we can get kernel
update from Kernel:openSUSE-13.1 project to 13.1:Ports.
Could you do it,
Hi Alex,
As the kernel does get built already as part of the Kernel:openSUSE-13.1
project, couldn't we just add that repo to the kiwi description and always
have the latest kernel included that way?
That has the drawback that images constantly rebuild (that repo is
pushed once a day) and
Hi Alex,
I just noticed that armv6 and aarch64 builds fine but armv7 never built! No
armv7 folder in download repo. Probably in scheduled state forever.
Hrm, Adrian, any idea what's going wrong here?
It just never gets scheduled before the code gets changed again. Lack
of available build
12 matches
Mail list logo