Andras Mantia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Until now I could apply the delta ISOs without problems. Now I cannot
> create the CD1. I verified, the md5sum for the RC1-CD1 is OK, the
> md5sum for the delta-iso is OK, but after applying, the result CD is
> NOT OK, both according to apply
J Sloan wrote:
> Kudos to the team for the incredible progress from the time of the late betas
> to RC1 - I've loaded RC1 onto my laptop and am quite pleased with it.
>
> I decided to play around with the Xgl stuff. I followed the directions, or so
> I thought, and I have some very cool effects g
Kudos to the team for the incredible progress from the time of the late betas
to RC1 - I've loaded RC1 onto my laptop and am quite pleased with it.
I decided to play around with the Xgl stuff. I followed the directions, or so
I thought, and I have some very cool effects going on now, but the the
d
Hi,
Until now I could apply the delta ISOs without problems. Now I cannot
create the CD1. I verified, the md5sum for the RC1-CD1 is OK, the
md5sum for the delta-iso is OK, but after applying, the result CD is
NOT OK, both according to applydeltaiso and a manual checking of the
md5sum:
md5sum
Hi all,
I have an issue with RC1 (I know, RC2 is ot now, but maybe the problem
remains):
I have a Soundblaster live 24 which uses driver CA0106. After installation it
worked quite well for almost a week. 3 days ago the system booted without any
sound.
I tried:
alsamixer: front analog is on 88%
On Saturday 22 April 2006 07:11, Christoph Thiel wrote:
> We need /var/log/zmd-* and /var/log/YaST2/* attached to a bug to be
> able to look into this ;)
#168607
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"I love virtuosity. I love danger." -Pierre Boulez, 2005
--
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Peter Buschbacher wrote:
> Why not use a apply.sh>logfile?
Because I never had any problem. With all the delta's I have applied, this
is the first time. I like to keep my system clean and not have X amount of
logfiles that I will never ever use.
houghi
--
Am Samstag, 22. April 2006 15:41 schrieb houghi:
> I used the following:
> for I in `seq 5`;do applydeltaiso SUSE-Linux-10.1-RC1-i386-CD${I}.iso \
> SUSE-Linux-10.1-RC1_RC2-i386-CD${I}.delta.iso \
> SUSE-Linux-10.1-RC2-i386-CD${I}.iso;done
>
> And therefore did not see the message.
Why not use a
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
> When running applydeltaiso to CD1 I get the following error:
>
> payload uncompress error
>
> Any clue as to what this means? I have over 27g of free disk space.
Looks like either your deltaiso or the original iso is corrupt. Did you
verify MD5SU
When running applydeltaiso to CD1 I get the following error:
payload uncompress error
Any clue as to what this means? I have over 27g of free disk space.
--
Ken Schneider
UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998
-
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:16:41PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:33, houghi wrote:
> >> Is there some way of checking if the iso's I made are correct in size and
> >> so on before I start and try to install them? e
Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:33, houghi wrote:
>> Is there some way of checking if the iso's I made are correct in size and
>> so on before I start and try to install them? e.g. CD2 is 377M in size.
>
> At the end applydeltaiso outputs the md5sum o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd wrote:
> I really don't like the delta iso process, even if I
> understand the necessity.
> but I beg the net install is still possible, with factory
> as source?
How to use smart to upgrade packages with Factory:
http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/20
jdd wrote:
> I really don't like the delta iso process, even if I
> understand the necessity.
I wasn't quite sure either, but it works just fine. I retrieved the
deltas last night, started the applydeltaiso, then went to bed.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
-
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> Just installed RC2 from delta'd ISOs, and on second boot the SUSEwatcher
> replacement has a red bang, so I click and select "Update" in the
> dialog for item "kernel"... and get another dialog with an angry red X
> and "Dependency Resolution Failed",
Just installed RC2 from delta'd ISOs, and on second boot the SUSEwatcher
replacement has a red bang, so I click and select "Update" in the
dialog for item "kernel"... and get another dialog with an angry red X
and "Dependency Resolution Failed", with message "Resolver failed".
I thought this st
Hello,
Am Samstag, 22. April 2006 08:36 schrieb Graham Smith:
> How do I file a bug report as I'm using SuSE 10.0 but using the
> src.rpm from the current 10.1 factory repository.
I'd say: file it against 10.1 - but please add a note that you are using
this Factory package on a 10.0 system.
If
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:11:08PM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:58, houghi wrote:
> > I don't see a `last line` as it is in a "for I in ..." :-/
>
> It should look something like this (cd5)
I understand. However the moment I saw that it was the size it was, it was
On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:58, houghi wrote:
> I don't see a `last line` as it is in a "for I in ..." :-/
It should look something like this (cd5)
[..]
xfntjp.noarch (bzip): applying delta
xml-commons-apis.noarch (bzip): applying delta
xml-commons-resolver.noarch (bzip): applying delta
xml-comm
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:44:56PM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:33, houghi wrote:
> > Is there some way of checking if the iso's I made are correct in size and
> > so on before I start and try to install them? e.g. CD2 is 377M in size.
>
> At the end applydeltai
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
> applydeltaiso does check this itself by calculating the md5sum. Just read the
> last line that is printed on the screen.
I don't see a `last line` as it is in a "for I in ..." :-/
houghi
--
Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:33:15PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > I'm glad to announce SUSE Linux 10.1 Codename "Agama Lizard" RC2. We
> > have fixed the majority of bugs from RC1 and will release an RC3 next
> > week.
> >
> > Durin
On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:33, houghi wrote:
> Is there some way of checking if the iso's I made are correct in size and
> so on before I start and try to install them? e.g. CD2 is 377M in size.
At the end applydeltaiso outputs the md5sum of the new iso. You can compare
that md5sum with thes
Hello,
Am Samstag, 22. April 2006 12:33 schrieb houghi:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > I'm glad to announce SUSE Linux 10.1 Codename "Agama Lizard" RC2. We
> > have fixed the majority of bugs from RC1 and will release an RC3 next
> > week.
> >
> > During the
Hello,
Am Samstag, 22. April 2006 12:33 schrieb houghi:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > I'm glad to announce SUSE Linux 10.1 Codename "Agama Lizard" RC2. We
> > have fixed the majority of bugs from RC1 and will release an RC3 next
> > week.
> >
> > During the
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> I'm glad to announce SUSE Linux 10.1 Codename "Agama Lizard" RC2. We
> have fixed the majority of bugs from RC1 and will release an RC3 next
> week.
>
> During the RC phase, we only provide delta ISOs of the media and
> update t
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Yes, it should be possible with factory as source,
nice, thanks
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
---
Hans Witvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As release date is getting closer, and xen is going to be a part of
> sles-10, i wonder if anybody else had problems with xen.
>
> At work, i was asked to have a look at virtualisation, and because of my
> background, i prefer xen above vmware.
> On 10.0
jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hello :-)
>
> I really don't like the delta iso process, even if I
> understand the necessity.
>
> but I beg the net install is still possible, with factory
> as source?
Yes, it should be possible with factory as source,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROT
As release date is getting closer, and xen is going to be a part of
sles-10, i wonder if anybody else had problems with xen.
At work, i was asked to have a look at virtualisation, and because of my
background, i prefer xen above vmware.
On 10.0 systems 32/64-bit, xen (vs 3.0) seems stable enough.
houghi wrote:
> One will not go without the other. Either you wait for a version to
> come out and perhaps even wait a bit, or you join in on the fun and
> see the ugliness in all its beauty.
Of course - all I said in my OP was that the process has room for
improvement, as the amount of work and
31 matches
Mail list logo
