Hi,
in the transcripts of various status meetings there are items about
explaining what a "Feature Freeze" is, but so far I've been unable to
find the most obvious information: When is the feature freeze for 10.2?
I'd like to see some packages (e.g. wxWidgets) updated for 10.2 - is
that still pos
2006/6/30, Lukas Ocilka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Actually, yast2-firewall has been proposed to be used by common users.
With some [Advanced] configuration for advanced users (or Server
settings).
Xinetd configuration is a bit different and it's not suitable for common
users. From my point of view,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:02:10PM -0600, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> > Will perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.997-10.i586.rpm be upgraded in 10.2? There is
> > a new version Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1 and it will be the last. SPF now has
> > a RFC and are working o
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:02:10PM -0600, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
>
> Will perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.997-10.i586.rpm be upgraded in 10.2? There is
> a new version Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1 and it will be the last. SPF now has
> a RFC and are working on a new Mail-SPF. Mail-SPF should be available
> Ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.997-10.i586.rpm be upgraded in 10.2? There is
a new version Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1 and it will be the last. SPF now has
a RFC and are working on a new Mail-SPF. Mail-SPF should be available
July-Aug 2006.
http://search.c
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:09:37AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> > > > > O
jdd wrote:
> houghi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:31:38AM +0200, jdd wrote:
>>
>>> So I'm pretty sure there is interest for low profile distro.
>>
>>
>> Why not use one of them for that specific purpose? DSL is very good. I
>> myself have Debian running on a 486 portable with 48MB of ram. Wo
houghi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:31:38AM +0200, jdd wrote:
So I'm pretty sure there is interest for low profile distro.
Why not use one of them for that specific purpose? DSL is very good. I
myself have Debian running on a 486 portable with 48MB of ram. Works
great.
There are many m
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:09:37AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> > > > On 2006-06-30 at 07:28:11 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote (s
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:31:38AM +0200, jdd wrote:
> So I'm pretty sure there is interest for low profile distro.
Why not use one of them for that specific purpose? DSL is very good. I
myself have Debian running on a 486 portable with 48MB of ram. Works
great.
There are many more distributions
Ricardo Cruz wrote:
Hi jdd,
Tell me, does this happen on text or graphical mode? And how many partitions
do you have?
In case you haven't tried the text mode, please do so.
of course in text mode :-).
what gave me problem is that the ram requirement get higher
at each new distribution. I
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> > > On 2006-06-30 at 07:28:11 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote (shortened):
> > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:30:57AM +0200, Andreas Vette
12 matches
Mail list logo
