jdd wrote:
> If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete
> seed for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
> jdd
I'm seeding i386 DVD. I will keep doing that till the next one, rc1.
But I haven't seen a single seed in the whole time for the biarch addon CD?
-
Vahis a écrit :
jdd wrote:
If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete
seed for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
jdd
I'm seeding i386 DVD. I will keep doing that till the next one, rc1.
But I haven't seen a single seed in the whole time for the biarc
What has happened to tn5250 (5250 terminal emulator for AS/400, er,
iSeries) in 10.2? x3270 is still there...
--
Glenn Holmer (Q-Link: ShadowM)
http://www.lyonlabs.org/commodore/c64.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What has happened to tn5250 (5250 terminal emulator for AS/400, er,
> iSeries) in 10.2? x3270 is still there...
It's still part of the factory tree,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Max
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete seed
>for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
If you're talking about the i386 CDs, I can't understand that. Azureus
has been seeding for over 22 hours. Okay,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>Vahis a écrit :
>> jdd wrote:
>>> If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete
>>> seed for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
>>> jdd
>> I'm seeding i386 DVD. I will keep doing that till the next one, r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Bolt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>
>> Vahis a écrit :
>>> jdd wrote:
If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete
seed for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
>>
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>David Bolt wrote:
>> [0] There's a copy I built here:
>> http://www.davjam.org/~davjam/linux/SUSE-10.0/i586/>
>> http://www.davjam.org/~davjam/linux/SUSE-10.1/i586/>
>
>And here's a package I maintain for SUSE 10.2 (factory), 10.1, 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Bolt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
>> David Bolt wrote:
>>> [0] There's a copy I built here:
>>> http://www.davjam.org/~davjam/linux/SUSE-10.0/i586/>
>>> http://www.davjam.org/~davjam/linux/SUSE-10.1/i586
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 05:11:58PM +0100, Stefan Dirsch wrote:
> > The idea of Packman hosting the packages was presented before. I believe
> > their
> > hesitation was not so much fear of GPL violation. More a matter of (1)
> > redistribution rights for Nvidia/ATi and (2) building the packages
David Bolt a écrit :
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
If I understand well the azureus screen, there is no more complete seed
for the beta2 cd's, we are all stuck to ~33% (37 clients)
If you're talking about the i386 CDs, I can't understand that. Azureus
has been seeding f
jdd a écrit :
my only concern was torrent stopping for lack of source. I now have the
isos and will seed them as soon as I have them copied in the righ folder
done and running...
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/mediawiki/index.php/GPS_Lowrance_GO
---
I'm not sure of that, But I have the feeling than the boxes
asking for "OK, cancel, retry" are not all the same.
I mean that some times the OK button is on the right,
sometimes on the left of the box (sometimes the OK is a big
left icon, when most of the time the icons are only decoration.
i
I just want to warn others than RW cd's are really not liable.
Actually I have some (handfull) of RW cd's I use for several
years, now. However I use then quite few, no more than 10 or
20 writing each
and now I have writing failures.
It's easy to verify this using K3B verify feature, so use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 23:53 +0100, jdd wrote:
> Actually I have some (handfull) of RW cd's I use for several years, now.
> However I use then quite few, no more than 10 or 20 writing each
>
> and now I have writing failures.
Put them under the
Wow, that looks just ever so much better than 10.1!!
Cool photo when booting the DVD.
The package selection and the use of colour is really good.
The "evaluation" bit when configuring the installation is superbly fast
now.
Minor:
When clicking on "more info" to find out exactly what informatio
The "free" VMware-server-1.0.1-29996.i386.rpm bombs out on a 10.2B2 xen
kernel:
Using 2.6.x kernel build system.
make: Entering directory `/tmp/vmware-config0/vmmon-only'
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18.2-4-xen/build/include/.. SUBDIRS=$PWD
SRCROOT=$PWD/. modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src
Carlos E. R. wrote:
>
> The Saturday 2006-11-11 at 23:53 +0100, jdd wrote:
>
> > Actually I have some (handfull) of RW cd's I use for several years, now.
> > However I use then quite few, no more than 10 or 20 writing each
>
> > and now I have writing failures.
>
> Put them under the sun for some h
18 matches
Mail list logo