Re: [opensuse-factory] a bug of makeSUSEdvd 0.35-1

2007-02-10 Thread David Bolt
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, James Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:- >line 432 >should be: >FREE_CD=$(echo ${CD_LINE}|awk '{print $(NF-2)}') The preceding line, and the following two lines also need replacing. These should do the job: TESTCD=$(echo ${CD_LINE}|awk '{print $(NF)}') FREE_CD=$(echo ${CD

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Alberto Passalacqua
Il giorno dom, 11/02/2007 alle 11.00 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann ha scritto: > > > Isn't it sufficient for share browsing to open ports 137 to 139 (udp > > > and/or tcp) for smb related traffic? > > > > You also need port 445 and, unfortunately, to accept packets from a > > random high port which is dy

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
> > Isn't it sufficient for share browsing to open ports 137 to 139 (udp > > and/or tcp) for smb related traffic? > > You also need port 445 and, unfortunately, to accept packets from a > random high port which is dynamically assigned. Thanks. Accept packets on what port from the random high port

[opensuse-factory] createrepo updated, seems now to be able to create sqlite db

2007-02-10 Thread Richard Bos
createrepo seems to have been updated and appears to have obtained functionality to create an sqlite database, besides or instead of the xml data file. More about this on in this email: http://lists.laiskiainen.org/pipermail/apt-rpm-laiskiainen.org/2007-February/000585.html Would it be possible

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Alberto Passalacqua
Il giorno dom, 11/02/2007 alle 09.20 +1300, Volker Kuhlmann ha scritto: > Isn't it sufficient for share browsing to open ports 137 to 139 (udp > and/or tcp) for smb related traffic? You also need port 445 and, unfortunately, to accept packets from a random high port which is dynamically assigned.

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Sunday 11 February 2007 05:46, James Tremblay wrote: > sounds like YAST needs to be modified to modify the firewall > automatically when opensuse joins a "workgroup" or Windows "domain". When you configure the desktop machine as smb client in yast, the firewall on that desktop needs to be appr

Re: [opensuse-factory] Latest KDE4 updates seem to break dbus on SUSE-10.2

2007-02-10 Thread Benji Weber
On 2/10/07, Markus Koßmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have the both the KDE3 and KDE4 repos added to my installation sources on SUSE-10.2. Today morning I decided to update all packages to the current version with yast2. That included a update of the KDE4 packages. After a restart KDE3 came u

Re: [opensuse-factory] ccid

2007-02-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Hans Witvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > any chance for a recent upgrade of ccid? > > In -current it is still: pcsc-ccid-1.0.1 > In the mean time, 1.1 was released, 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 > > AFAIK, the Midentity tokens from KOBIL need the latest version. > Perhaps a candidate for 10.3?

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread M9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dominique Leuenberger schreef: "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/10/07 2:43 PM >>> >> Do I have to understand you are 'responsible' for the FW? >> And if so, do you want these logs sent to you? >> Or do I attach them to Bug # 243809 ? > > Hi, > > No.

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Dominique Leuenberger
>>> "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/10/07 2:43 PM >>> > > Do I have to understand you are 'responsible' for the FW? > And if so, do you want these logs sent to you? > Or do I attach them to Bug # 243809 ? Hi, No.. so far I'm not associated more to Novell than you. Except maybe also having other pro

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread M9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dominique Leuenberger schreef: "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/10/07 11:49 AM >>> >> I did not encounter 'real' attacks yet, but >> I also agree that this should be fixed properly: Why does the firewall >> not respond to the usernames and passwords

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread Dominique Leuenberger
>>> "M9." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/10/07 11:49 AM >>> >I did not encounter 'real' attacks yet, but >I also agree that this should be fixed properly: Why does the firewall >not respond to the usernames and passwords? >If it would, there would be no problem at all. >Normally one should be able to verif

Re: [opensuse-factory] Samba and SuSEfirewall

2007-02-10 Thread M9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Volker Kuhlmann schreef: >>> It worked in 9.3 (if I remember right), and it's actually an obstacle >>> for new users who try to configure samba, do that properly in Yast, but >>> can't browse the local network even after selecting "Open firewall >>>