-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M9. schreef:
Amarok works without libxine1, (which is not to find), thnx!!!
No, it is not. ;-(
- --
Have a nice day,
M9. Now, is the only time that exists.
OS: Linux 2.6.21-8-default x86_64
Huidige gebruiker: [EMAIL
Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI: Current freetype in FACTORY is broken, use the version from Alpha4
instead of updating,
The package checked in last night should fix everything,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH,
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are probably already informed :-), but the last 10.2 kernel update
brake the computer boot...
Did you install the new perl-bootloader as well? If there are problems,
please open a bugreport with all details,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, M9. wrote:
I am just ready with the install of Alpha4...
I changed everything i needed to:
/boot from 30MB 100MB
/ , 1GB, same
/usr, from 3.5 4GB
/var ,1GB, same, but added:
/var/lib, 1GB,(lib was the cause:400MB)
/opt, 2.5GB same,
/tmp, 2GB, was 3GB.
swap,
Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are probably already informed :-), but the last 10.2 kernel update
brake the computer boot...
Did you install the new perl-bootloader as well? If there are problems,
Marcus Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are probably already informed :-), but the last 10.2 kernel update
brake the computer boot...
Did you install the new perl-bootloader as well? If
Hello,
I can't install Alpha 4 on a System with a small (500MB) DOS Partition
on /dev/sda1 ? The new installer like to resize the Partition. When I go to
manual partitioning I have only EVMS Drives, after reformat the DOS
partition to a swap Partition I can install Alpha 4 and I found all my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M9. schreef:
I must say that it is very difficult to handle, because when an entry in
grub does not work, because 10.2 reads different as 10.3, it is
impossible to mount a 10.3 ext2 /boot partition, in the 10.2 partitioner.
This way the working
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:05, M9. wrote:
M9. schreef:
I must say that it is very difficult to handle, because when an entry in
grub does not work, because 10.2 reads different as 10.3, it is
impossible to mount a 10.3 ext2 /boot partition, in the 10.2 partitioner.
This way the working