* Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Apr 22. 2007 16:02]:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > > The parsing speed is what should be improved in 10.3, but what is faster,
> > > download or parsing, depends on Internet connection speed, internal
> > > comput
* Christian Boltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Apr 22. 2007 16:32]:
>
> What about using zsync? I never used it myself, but what I read on
> http://zsync.moria.org.uk/ looks very promising :-)
We are looking into zsync for openSuSE 10.3
Klaus
---
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG
Well, Herr Kuhlmann, have you ever considered that the average dialup user
wouldn't be stupid enough to try applying remote updates over his link?
Unless he was incredibly desperate not to have his Apache server hacked XD
Almost ALL computers these days have a broadband connection of some form.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:16:12AM +1000, Horst G?nther Burkhardt III wrote:
> > Uhhm, you're talking about downloading the updates/repodata/*.xml.gz
> > files? For the 10.2 updates that's about 13MB currently. I'd be very
> > interested to hear how you download that over a dialup at a realistic
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alberto Passalacqua schreef:
>> The parsing speed is what should be improved in 10.3, but what is faster,
>> download or parsing, depends on Internet connection speed, internal computer
>> I/O speed, amount of RAM and CPU speed.
>
> In my opinion
On Sunday 22 April 2007 08:11, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > The parsing speed is what should be improved in 10.3, but what is faster,
> > download or parsing, depends on Internet connection speed, internal
> > computer I/O speed, amount of RAM and CPU speed.
>
> In my opinion the evaluation of ho
> The parsing speed is what should be improved in 10.3, but what is faster,
> download or parsing, depends on Internet connection speed, internal computer
> I/O speed, amount of RAM and CPU speed.
In my opinion the evaluation of how the update system work should be
independent from users' habit
Hello,
on Sonntag, 22. April 2007, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> On Sun 22 Apr 2007 20:28:37 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> > Also the update source is not relevant here is it? When
> > opensuseupdater tells you that updates are available the update
> > repo has already been refreshed hasn't it?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Schlander schreef:
> Den Sunday 22 April 2007 09:59:47 skrev Marcus Meissner:
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:06:54PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
>>> On Sun 22 Apr 2007 05:38:30 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
But the problem is not t
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:11:05PM +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > The parsing speed is what should be improved in 10.3, but what is faster,
> > download or parsing, depends on Internet connection speed, internal
> > computer
> > I/O speed, amount of RAM and CPU speed.
In general, our li
On Sunday 22 April 2007 07:09, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
> > IMHO, the feeling about update speed is, in a part, problem for people
> > used to limitations and different approach in another OS.
>
> In my opinion the update speed is not unimportant. It's true you don't
> have to look at it and work
> IMHO, the feeling about update speed is, in a part, problem for people used
> to
> limitations and different approach in another OS.
In my opinion the update speed is not unimportant. It's true you don't
have to look at it and work while YaST is updating your system. But
having a slow update
On Sun 22 Apr 2007 20:28:37 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Also the update source is not relevant here is it? When opensuseupdater tells
> you that updates are available the update repo has already been refreshed
> hasn't it? So it won't need to download new metadata again at YOU startup.
Den Sunday 22 April 2007 09:59:47 skrev Marcus Meissner:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:06:54PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > On Sun 22 Apr 2007 05:38:30 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> > > But the problem is not the downloading of updated metadata, which
> > > usually takes a few seconds t
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:06:54PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> On Sun 22 Apr 2007 05:38:30 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
>
> > But the problem is not the downloading of updated metadata, which usually
> > takes a few seconds tops.
>
> Uhhm, you're talking about downloading the updates/
On Saturday 21 April 2007 12:35, Christian Jäger wrote:
> It certainly doesn't need to check _all_
> installation sources IMHO. This is a real waste of time.
>
> See also https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266864.
For technical part you already have answers.
IMHO, the feeling about upda
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> On Sun 22 Apr 2007 05:38:30 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
>
> > But the problem is not the downloading of updated metadata, which usually
> > takes a few seconds tops.
>
> Uhhm, you're talking about downloading the updates/repodata/*.xml.gz
>
On Sun 22 Apr 2007 05:38:30 NZST +1200, Martin Schlander wrote:
> But the problem is not the downloading of updated metadata, which usually
> takes a few seconds tops.
Uhhm, you're talking about downloading the updates/repodata/*.xml.gz
files? For the 10.2 updates that's about 13MB currently. I'
On 4/21/07, Christian Jäger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if other vendors add patch-priority packages into their
> repository, eg for security updates? We shouldn't discriminate against
> them.
>
> _
> Benjamin Weber
>
I'm not quite sure I understood that correctly. Are you talking about
pa
> What if other vendors add patch-priority packages into their
> repository, eg for security updates? We shouldn't discriminate against
> them.
>
> _
> Benjamin Weber
>
I'm not quite sure I understood that correctly. Are you talking about
patches present in a repo different from the one a hypoth
Den Saturday 21 April 2007 19:35:36 skrev Christian Jäger:
> I think it would spare many users a lot of annoyance if updates went a
> little more quickly and silently. I can just about understand that any
> time I want to install a package, YaST refreshed all
> installation-sources (though this is
On 4/21/07, Christian Jäger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I think it would spare many users a lot of annoyance if updates went a
little more quickly and silently. I can just about understand that any
time I want to install a package, YaST refreshed all
installation-sources (though this is al
Hello,
I think it would spare many users a lot of annoyance if updates went a
little more quickly and silently. I can just about understand that any
time I want to install a package, YaST refreshed all
installation-sources (though this is also debateable - wouldn't one
update a day suffice?); but
23 matches
Mail list logo
