-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/suse/x86_64/sax2-libsax-8.1-83.x86_64.rpm
after retry few times stil fails.
(During update RC3>RC4)
M9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFcD5iCOhj5qUv
* M9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 01. 2006 15:38]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> /suse/x86_64/sax2-libsax-8.1-83.x86_64.rpm
>
> after retry few times stil fails.
> (During update RC3>RC4)
How does it fail ?
Read error from media/network ? dependency error ?
pre/post script er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2006-12-01 at 16:21 +0100, M9 wrote:
> subproces fails
> see attachment.
Er... could you next time send such big attachments directly to the person
needing it, and not send it to the list at large?
It is 200 KB, and not everybody has wi
Op vrijdag 1 december 2006 16:35, schreef Carlos E. R.:
> The Friday 2006-12-01 at 16:21 +0100, M9 wrote:
> > subproces fails
> > see attachment.
>
> Er... could you next time send such big attachments directly to the person
> needing it, and not send it to the list at large?
>
> It is 200 KB, and
On Friday 01 December 2006 08:26, Monkey 9 wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Er... could you next time send such big attachments directly to the
> > person needing it, and not send it to the list at large?
> >
> > It is 200 KB, and not everybody has wide band. There are people out
> > there using metered networ
Op vrijdag 1 december 2006 17:41, schreef Randall R Schulz:
> On Friday 01 December 2006 08:26, Monkey 9 wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > Er... could you next time send such big attachments directly to the
> > > person needing it, and not send it to the list at large?
> > >
> > > It is 200 KB, and not ever
On Friday 01 December 2006 09:11, Monkey 9 wrote:
> ...
> >
> > You might also want to think carefully about which URLs you leave
> > visible on your desktop before broadcasting such a screen capture.
>
> urls? what urls?
OK. A DNS name. It's in the taskbar shown in Saxf.jpg.
> M9
RRS
* M9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 01. 2006 16:23]:
> >>
> >> /suse/x86_64/sax2-libsax-8.1-83.x86_64.rpm
> >>
> >> after retry few times stil fails.
> >> (During update RC3>RC4)
>
> subproces fails
> see attachment.
Looks more like a pre/post script problem. Missing PreReq ?
Please report via bugzilla
Klaus Kaempf schrieb:
> Looks more like a pre/post script problem. Missing PreReq ?
> Please report via bugzilla and attach full logs, eps.
> /var/log/YaST2/y2log and /mnt/var/log/YaST2/y2logRPM.
That's what I initially thought, but sax2-libsax does not have any
%pre/%post scriptlets (which is a b
Op vrijdag 1 december 2006 18:50, schreef Andreas Hanke:
> Klaus Kaempf schrieb:
> > Looks more like a pre/post script problem. Missing PreReq ?
> > Please report via bugzilla and attach full logs, eps.
> > /var/log/YaST2/y2log and /mnt/var/log/YaST2/y2logRPM.
>
> That's what I initially thought, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Friday 2006-12-01 at 17:26 +0100, Monkey 9 wrote:
> I am very sorry, and appologise.
> It won't happen again..
At least, I could use it to have a look at a 10.2 desktop, as my install
failed ;-)
It does surprise me a lot that gzip could compre
Op vrijdag 1 december 2006 21:41, schreef Carlos E. R.:
> The Friday 2006-12-01 at 17:26 +0100, Monkey 9 wrote:
> > I am very sorry, and appologise.
> > It won't happen again..
>
> At least, I could use it to have a look at a 10.2 desktop, as my install
> failed ;-)
Note that i have my kickerpanel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Saturday 2006-12-02 at 13:38 +0100, Monkey 9 wrote:
> > At least, I could use it to have a look at a 10.2 desktop, as my install
> > failed ;-)
>
> Note that i have my kickerpanel adjusted to 53 pixels, transparent..
I saw that :-)
- --
Cheer
>>> Reply on 04-12-2006 9:58:22 <<<
> On Friday 01 December 2006 09:11, Monkey 9 wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > > You might also want to think carefully about which URLs you
leave
> > > visible on your desktop before broadcasting such a screen
capture.
> >
> > urls? what urls?
>
> OK. A DNS name. It'
On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:59, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> ...
>
> Randall,
>
> If you woulnd't have known this site, you'd probably not even have
> remarked it.. so you just pointed it out :-)
I certainly have never seen that site before, nor do I have even the
slightest interest in what i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randall R Schulz schreef:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:59, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Randall,
>>
>> If you woulnd't have known this site, you'd probably not even have
>> remarked it.. so you just pointed it out :-)
>
> I certainly ha
On Monday 04 December 2006 07:34, M9 wrote:
> Randall R Schulz schreef:
> > ...
> >
> > I certainly have never seen that site before, nor do I have even
> > the slightest interest in what is purveyed there. The name is
> > enough to signal its purpose.
>
> So i guess we will have to call you st. ra
>>> Reply on 04-12-2006 17:48:20 <<<
> On Monday 04 December 2006 07:34, M9 wrote:
> > Randall R Schulz schreef:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > I certainly have never seen that site before, nor do I have even
> > > the slightest interest in what is purveyed there. The name is
> > > enough to signal its p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominique Leuenberger schreef:
>
Reply on 04-12-2006 17:48:20 <<<
>
>> On Monday 04 December 2006 07:34, M9 wrote:
>>> Randall R Schulz schreef:
...
I certainly have never seen that site before, nor do I have even
the slighte
On Monday 04 December 2006 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> ...
>
> > I'm far from the typical sex-negative, puritanical American. I just
> > don't go for children.
>
> Now I think you're exageraging a lot!
Exaggerating what? You know nothing about me. I'm not even attracted to
women, for cr
20 matches
Mail list logo
