On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:38:51AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> On 10 May 2006 at 21:10, houghi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:59:42PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> > > Excuse me, seems that I did made the last run as normal user and not as
> > > root, I tried it again as root, and e
On 10 May 2006 at 21:10, houghi wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:59:42PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> > Excuse me, seems that I did made the last run as normal user and not as
> > root, I tried it again as root, and everything is fine with your new
> > script (stupid me).
>
> No, everyth
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:32:13AM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > OK I asume you are talking about:
> > chmod: missing operand after `+x'
> > Try `chmod --help' for more information.
> >
> > Cleaning that up.
>
> Excactly, that was the message, but after some further tests, the
Hello,
> OK I asume you are talking about:
> chmod: missing operand after `+x'
> Try `chmod --help' for more information.
>
> Cleaning that up.
Excactly, that was the message, but after some further tests, the
resulting DVD generated by the updated script seems to be o.k. I will
check it today a
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:11:34PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> @Houghi: I tested the 0.30 beta, too, there were still some "roughness"
> inside the script, messages like "couldnt set to "x", so i
> finally took the 0.29 which went fine for me.
OK I asume you are talking about:
chmod: missi
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:59:42PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> Excuse me, seems that I did made the last run as normal user and not as
> root, I tried it again as root, and everything is fine with your new
> script (stupid me).
No, everything is NOT fine. It should be run as user, not as ro
Hi,
>> @Houghi: I tested the 0.30 beta, too, there were still some "roughness"
>> inside the script, messages like "couldnt set to "x", so i
>> finally took the 0.29 which went fine for me.
>
> Could you please elaborate on this? What roughness are you talking about?
Excuse me, seems that I di
> Could you please elaborate on this? What roughness are you talking about?
> You can always mail me directly.
I send you asap a copy of a run-through of the skript, just have to
reboot...
--
###
Dr. Rainer Hattenhauer
Drosselweg 5
37441 Bad Sachsa
fon +495523812
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:11:34PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> @Houghi: I tested the 0.30 beta, too, there were still some "roughness"
> inside the script, messages like "couldnt set to "x", so i
> finally took the 0.29 which went fine for me.
Could you please elaborate on this? What rough
Marcus, Houghi:
Thank you, now makeSUSEdvd works perfectly with my gpg-Setup. I'm
hopefully awaiting the final release tomorrow.
@Houghi: I tested the 0.30 beta, too, there were still some "roughness"
inside the script, messages like "couldnt set to "x", so i
finally took the 0.29 which went fin
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:48:44AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> This is because if a user installs from your installation source (DVD
> or whatever) his system ultimately trusts your key for receiving
> Online Updates.
Oh boy. With all the testing I have added and deleted my keys several
time
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:33:05AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> You must create (or already have) a GPG key pair to resign the
> CD content.
>
> gpg --gen-key if you do not have one yet.
The new makeSUSEdvd 0.30 Beta is available on houghi.org/script/makeSUSEdvd
That one will warn you if you
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:46:29AM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> > You must create (or already have) a GPG key pair to resign the
> > CD content.
> >
> > gpg --gen-key if you do not have one yet.
> >
>
> Thank you, already thought that might be the problem. Should the key
Hi Marcus,
> You must create (or already have) a GPG key pair to resign the
> CD content.
>
> gpg --gen-key if you do not have one yet.
>
Thank you, already thought that might be the problem. Should the key
have some special form, i.e. DSA or RSA, 2048 bit etc., or should i take
the defaults
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:30:59AM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hoped that the problem with makeSUSEdvd was solved, but I still
> ran into problems.
> The situation:
> I'm working in an updated suse-factory install (smart update/upgrade)
> and I'm using the makeSUSEdvd Skript v0.29 w
Hi,
hoped that the problem with makeSUSEdvd was solved, but I still
ran into problems.
The situation:
I'm working in an updated suse-factory install (smart update/upgrade)
and I'm using the makeSUSEdvd Skript v0.29 which I downloaded from
sourceforge.
When doing the remastering of the 5 CDs, the
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:23:02AM +0200, Jan Karjalainen wrote:
> Where can I find the latest version of makeSUSEdvd?
> SourceForge has version 0.29 (2005-11-19)...
0.29 is the latest version. On SF I just edit the version number, upload
the new files and delete the old ones.
houghi
--
Nutze di
Where can I find the latest version of makeSUSEdvd?
SourceForge has version 0.29 (2005-11-19)...
/Jan K.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > Before this, I never used gpg and I asume many others are the same. Say if
> > the script asked for the key, I would have no idea what to enter.
>
> What about checking, if there is a local secret key, and if not, add the
> poss
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:53:41PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:30:34PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> > This is only because you did not use all CDs.
>
> I know.
>
> > Adding the LOCAL_KEY manually works for me.
>
> Indeed, as does calculating it correctly.
>
> > Hougi
Hi,
> I used RC5/Goldmaster to test.
Excellent, that makes me very happy ;-)
Thank you very much,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:57:18PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:36:58PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> > Hi Marcus and Houghi,
>
>
> > Great job, seems that you fixed the problem.
>
> That was all Marcus. I just kept nagging. :-)
Yeah and I fall for it ;)
> > Do you t
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:36:58PM +0200, Rainer Hattenhauer wrote:
> Hi Marcus and Houghi,
> Great job, seems that you fixed the problem.
That was all Marcus. I just kept nagging. :-)
> Do you think that the
> makeSUSEdvd script will now work as well with the goldmaster which will
> be publis
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:30:34PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> This is only because you did not use all CDs.
I know.
> Adding the LOCAL_KEY manually works for me.
Indeed, as does calculating it correctly.
> Hougi: Perhaps it's best to ask the user for the key, then eventually check,
> i
Hi Marcus and Houghi,
> Here lies already part of the solution. My key would be 08AD8FC5 and not
> 0x08AD8FC5. So I added the following line right after LOCAL_KEY=`gpg ...
> LOCAL_KEY=0x${LOCAL_KEY}
>
> I now get the following error:
> Cannot solve dependencies automatically. Manual intev
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:19:30PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> I experienced the same dependency, since i also used CD1 only.
> But at least the original signing problem is now passed.
Yes.
With CD1-3 there is no error anymore. W00t!
Now some more serious testing and some changing in the scr
Am Montag, 8. Mai 2006 19:16 schrieb houghi:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > I have brought "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD" down a few lines.
> > > "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD" uses the variable $LOCAL_KEY, so it might be better
> > > to use it after $LOCAL_KEY is calculated.
>
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:16:41PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > > I have brought "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD" down a few lines. "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD"
> > > uses the variable $LOCAL_KEY, so it might be better to use it after
> > > $LOCAL_KEY is cal
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I have brought "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD" down a few lines. "PUT_KEY_IN_INITRD"
> > uses the variable $LOCAL_KEY, so it might be better to use it after
> > $LOCAL_KEY is calculated.
>
> Yes, I had a "LOCAL_KEY=0x" at the beginning o
Actually this is the full diff which was working for me:
Note that I just moved the keyid with which to sign to a toplevel define.
Ciao, Marcus
--- /suse/meissner/makeSUSEdvd 2006-05-08 16:29:25.0 +0200
+++ /root/makeSUSEdvd 2006-05-08 15:52:44.0 +0200
@@ -22,12 +22,14 @@
#
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:25:00PM +0200, houghi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:31:13PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > I have identified and fixed the problem.
> >
> > The key needs to be added to the initial ramdisk
> > of the CDD/DVD, so some extra magic is necessary.
> >
> > I have att
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:31:13PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> I have identified and fixed the problem.
>
> The key needs to be added to the initial ramdisk
> of the CDD/DVD, so some extra magic is necessary.
>
> I have attached the patch to make it work,
> apply with
> patch makeSUSEdv
Am Montag, 8. Mai 2006 16:31 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> I have identified and fixed the problem.
>
> The key needs to be added to the initial ramdisk
> of the CDD/DVD, so some extra magic is necessary.
>
> I have attached the patch to make it work,
> apply with
> patch makeSUSEdvd < msd.pat
I have identified and fixed the problem.
The key needs to be added to the initial ramdisk
of the CDD/DVD, so some extra magic is necessary.
I have attached the patch to make it work,
apply with
patch makeSUSEdvd < msd.pat
Ciao, Marcus
--- /suse/meissner/makeSUSEdvd 2006-05-08 12:13:14.0
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Resigning of files that did not change is not necessary.
No, but it is easier then looking wich ones were changed and wich ones
were not and perhaps missing one.
> > gpg --detach-sign -u $LOCAL_KEY -a $CD_DIR/media.1/products
> >
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:51:19PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 12:43 schrieb houghi:
>
> > I still get the same error. I now have:
> > #Remove keys in content
> > grep -v ^META $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
> > mv $CD_DIR/content.bak $CD_DI
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:51:19PM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 12:43 schrieb houghi:
>
> > I still get the same error. I now have:
> > #Remove keys in content
> > grep -v ^META $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
> > mv $CD_DIR/content.bak $CD_DI
Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 12:43 schrieb houghi:
> I still get the same error. I now have:
> #Remove keys in content
> grep -v ^META $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
> mv $CD_DIR/content.bak $CD_DIR/content
> grep -v ^KEY $CD_DIR/content > $CD_DIR/content.bak
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
