[opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Reiser4 was dropped from 10.1. What about 10.2 As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really adopted. I think Suse should still be willing to support new stuff, not as Red Hat. Reiser4 is now qu

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Marcel Hilzinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060803 10:56]: > As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the > kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really > adopted. No, its not the communities task to bridge gaps that namesys opened. AFAICT,

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Marcel Hilzinger
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Philipp Thomas: > * Marcel Hilzinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060803 10:56]: > > As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the > > kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really > > adopted. > > No, its n

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Pascal Bleser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Philipp Thomas: >> * Marcel Hilzinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060803 10:56]: >>> As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the >>> kernel-list, they need s

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
> > As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the > > kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really > > adopted. > > No, its not the communities task to bridge gaps that namesys opened. Could it be instead that some kernel developers have pe

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-03 Thread Eberhard Moenkeberg
Hi, On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really adopted. No, its not the communities task to bridge gaps that namesys opened. Could it be instead

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-04 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Marcel Hilzinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060803 17:03]: > Perhaps you forgot/don't know, how ReiserFS got included in the kernel... Now being very nearly 7 years with R&D, I know perfectly well how reiserfs got included. But you learn from experience and dealing with Hans Reiser is not very easy

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-04 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Volker Kuhlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060804 00:33]: > I mean, how else would you completely ignore truely innovative technology > when it's handed to you on a silver platter for free... It wasn't ignored completely, if you followed the discussions on lkml. But AFAIR, there where quite a few i

Re: [opensuse-factory] Status of reiser4

2006-08-07 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Marcel Hilzinger wrote: > Reiser4 was dropped from 10.1. What about 10.2 > > As namesys has a lot of (non technical) problems with some members of the > kernel-list, they need support from the community to get reiser4 really > adopted. I think Suse shoul