On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:40, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
Dňa Pi 2. Jún 2006 08:37 Ulrich Windl napísal:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:40, Andreas Hanke wrote:
[snip]
Probably rather cosmetic, but ugly. No fix available so far according to
Bugzilla, and not that important. But maybe later?
- Taboo flag is not persistent in the package manager
Hi,
Ulrich Windl schrieb:
I think that's basically a dangerous option (Think of your webbrowser
having a global option trust expired and invalid certificates for
secure connections: You would want it per certificate, not globally)
But in any case there's a problem there, an option in the UI
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
Not because of its severity - it's actually labelled as
Andreas Hanke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
It will
Graham Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Morning folks,
Would this list be the best place to post feedback regarding the test build
of
the update stack packages you posted yesterday Andreas? Or is it better moved
to bugzilla...? If so I can move all this to bugzilla with logs etc.
Rafael E. Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To add quick observations after updating the update stack posted by Andreas.
1. The Yast2 online updater hanged while trying to download the updated
packages (it stopped downloading one of the packages mid-way and just sat
there for a while.)
Rafael E. Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To add quick observations after updating the update stack posted by Andreas.
1. The Yast2 online updater hanged while trying to download the updated
packages (it stopped downloading one of the packages mid-way and just sat
there for a while.)
Hi,
also indirectly related to the test packages: Is it known that the set of test
packages will make ruby-zypp uninstallable? It needs libzypp.so.0, but the set
of test packages replaces that with libzypp.so.1.
ruby-zypp doesn't seem to be used by anything so far, but still, some people
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
= Bugzilla?
Done and reported as #179018.
Thanks - and I've just updated my packages on the ftp server to
include this one as well,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg,
To add quick observations after updating the update stack posted by Andreas.
1. The Yast2 online updater hanged while trying to download the updated
packages (it stopped downloading one of the packages mid-way and just sat
there for a while.) Killed the process, downloaded and installed the
Morning folks,
Would this list be the best place to post feedback regarding the test build of
the update stack packages you posted yesterday Andreas? Or is it better moved
to bugzilla...? If so I can move all this to bugzilla with logs etc.
Here are my observations so far anyway.
1.
The
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:34:15AM +0100, Graham Anderson wrote:
Morning folks,
Would this list be the best place to post feedback regarding the test build
of
the update stack packages you posted yesterday Andreas? Or is it better moved
to bugzilla...? If so I can move all this to
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:12:38PM +0200, houghi wrote:
`rug sl` gave me a time of 1.086 seconds (previously 12 minutes)
Just to be sure that there was nothing left in a cache, I rebooted. Then
it took about 2.4 seconds. I will leave the machine on for a few hours and
see if there is any
On 24 May 2006 at 14:10, houghi wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:12:38PM +0200, houghi wrote:
`rug sl` gave me a time of 1.086 seconds (previously 12 minutes)
Just to be sure that there was nothing left in a cache, I rebooted. Then
it took about 2.4 seconds. I will leave the machine on
15 matches
Mail list logo
