Hi,
houghi wrote:
That does already exist. Sort of. Stable is 10.1. Testing is Factory and
unstable is adding extra repositories and install stuff from non-suse
places.
As least that is how I see it.
Well, sometimes the dependencies are broken in Factory. Therefore I
would label Factory
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi,
houghi wrote:
That does already exist. Sort of. Stable is 10.1. Testing is Factory and
unstable is adding extra repositories and install stuff from non-suse
places.
As least that is how I see it.
Well, sometimes the dependencies
Hi,
Stefan Dirsch wrote:
# rpm -Uvh xorg-x11-*
error: Failed dependencies:
libXft.so.1 is needed by (installed) intel-iidb91036-9.1.036-1.i386
libXaw.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed) xterm-215-2.x86_64
Ok. But I can't understand the Xaw issue:
libXaw.so.8()(64bit) is
Tobias Burnus a écrit :
Well, sometimes the dependencies are broken in Factory. Therefore I
would label Factory as Unstable and the alpha releases as Testing.
For them who are not familiar with debian names,
http://www.debian.org/releases/
stable is debian 3.1 Sarge. Debian become 3 3 or 4
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In order not to do again the mistakes made with the zen update and
10.1, I think we should have _two_ feature freeze dates...
One for the _new things_ (patterns, Xorg 7...) and one for the _new
releases_ of already used things (Kde, Gnome)
We had basically so
Dominique Leuenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was also very concerned when I saw the 'most annoying bugs' list
today (as I epxected Alpha 3).
The worst that can happen to openSUSE is having (again) a release with
bugs like the updater in 10.1. Even though they are fixed now, it's
still
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
My plan is more to integrate risky stuff as early as possible,
e.g. patterns now and X11R7 now ;-)
I would say X11R7 yes (we are not the only ones to test it), but
Pattern... we are not even sure of what they are :-() -
so be
